Endometriosis is a chronic disease associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Several classification systems for the severity of endometriosis have been proposed. Of these, the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification is the most well-known. The ENZIAN classification was developed to classify deep infiltrating endometriosis and focused on the retroperitoneal structures. The endometriosis fertility index was developed to predict the fertility outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for endometriosis. Finally, the American Association of Gynecological Laparoscopists classification is currently being developed, for which 30 endometriosis experts are analyzing and researching data by assigning scores to categories considered important; however, it has not yet been fully validated and published. Currently, none of the classification systems are considered the gold standard. In this article, we review the classification systems, identify their pros and cons, and discuss what improvements need to be made to each system in the future.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Imaging of Urinary Bladder and Ureteral Endometriosis with Emphasis on Diagnosis and Technique Anuradha S. Shenoy-Bhangle, Izabela Pires Franco, Lauren J. Ray, Jinjin Cao, Aoife Kilcoyne, Natally Horvat, Luciana Pardini Chamie Academic Radiology.2024; 31(9): 3659. CrossRef
Epidemiology of infertility in women with endometriosis Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Valentina Chiappa, Marcello Ceccaroni, Giovanni Roviglione, Luca Savelli, Simone Ferrero, Francesco Raspagliesi, Ludovica Spanò Bascio Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2024; 92: 102454. CrossRef
Analysis of VEGF, IGF1/2 and the Long Noncoding RNA (lncRNA) H19 Expression in Polish Women with Endometriosis Beata Smolarz, Tomasz Szaflik, Hanna Romanowicz, Magdalena Bryś, Ewa Forma, Krzysztof Szyłło International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(10): 5271. CrossRef
Acupuncture for pain and pain-related disability in deep infiltrating endometriosis Giulia Chiarle, Gianni Allais, Silvia Sinigaglia, Gisella Airola, Sara Rolando, Fabiola Bergandi, Salvatore Micalef, Chiara Benedetto Frontiers in Pain Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Inguinal hernia following the use of fluid anti-adhesive agents in laparoscopic surgery: a literature review and case report Man-Jung Chu, Pei-Shen Huang Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(3): 1805. CrossRef
Horizons in Endometriosis: Proceedings of the Montreux Reproductive Summit, 14-15 July 2023 A Vallée, E Saridogan, F Petraglia, J Keckstein, N Polyzos, C Wyns, L Gianaroli, B Tarlatzis, J.M. Ayoubi, A Feki Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn.2024; 16(Supplement): 1. CrossRef
Analysis of factors affecting pregnancy rate after laparoscopic surgery for infertility associated with endometriosis Jinna Zhang, Ningzi Lian, Sang Guo, Xi Xie European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2024; 297: 214. CrossRef
Beyond the surface: Does stage I-II endometriosis impact fertility? Exploring the challenges of mild disease Begum Aydogan Mathyk, Esra Cetin, Youssef Youssef, Anthony N. Imudia, Diana Encalada Soto, Emad Mikhail, Gaby Moawad Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2024; 96: 102501. CrossRef
Nerve Bundle Density and Expression of NGF and IL-1β Are Intra-Individually Heterogenous in Subtypes of Endometriosis Mahfuza Sreya, Dwayne R. Tucker, Jennifer Yi, Fahad T. Alotaibi, Anna F. Lee, Heather Noga, Paul J. Yong Biomolecules.2024; 14(5): 583. CrossRef
The Known, the Unknown and the Future of the Pathophysiology of Endometriosis Maria Ariadna Ochoa Bernal, Asgerally T. Fazleabas International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(11): 5815. CrossRef
Changes in the number and activity of natural killer cells and its clinical association with endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis Getnet Gedefaw Azeze, Ling Wu, Bekalu Kassie Alemu, Chi Chiu Wang, Tao Zhang F&S Reviews.2024; 5(2): 100072. CrossRef
Resveratrol ameliorates mitochondrial biogenesis and reproductive outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing assisted reproduction: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial Negar Ajabi Ardehjani, Marzieh Agha-Hosseini, Maryam Shabani Nashtaei, Mahshad Khodarahmian, Maryam Shabani, Masoome Jabarpour, Farzane Fereidouni, Tayebeh Rastegar, Fardin Amidi Journal of Ovarian Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessment of the Ferroptosis Regulators: Glutathione Peroxidase 4, Acyl-Coenzyme A Synthetase Long-Chain Family Member 4, and Transferrin Receptor 1 in Patient-Derived Endometriosis Tissue Lidia A. Mielke Cabello, Gabriela Meresman, Dogus Darici, Noelia Carnovale, Birthe Heitkötter, Miriam Schulte, Nancy A. Espinoza-Sánchez, Quang-Khoi Le, Ludwig Kiesel, Sebastian D. Schäfer, Martin Götte Biomolecules.2024; 14(7): 876. CrossRef
A Primer on Clinical Classification and Pathophysiology of Endometriosis Anuradha Mishra, Deepak Modi Fertility Science and Research.2024; 11: 7. CrossRef
Continued improvement to imaging diagnosis and treatment triage of endometriosis: The role of the multi-disciplinary conference Nikita Consul, Hilary R. Haber, Peter R. Movilla, Mukesh G. Harisinghani, Avinash Kambadakone, Aoife Kilcoyne, Anuradha S. Shenoy-Bhangle Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology.2024; 53(6): 663. CrossRef
Case report: Human seminal plasma allergy diagnosis for a woman with unexplained infertility Gabija Didziokaite, Aida Kuznecovaite, Gabija Biliute, Violeta Kvedariene Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Characteristics and Locations of Lesions in Patients with Endometriosis Using #ENZIAN Classification: An Observational Study Vimee Bindra, Nikitha Reddy, P. Swetha, C. Archana Reddy, N. Balakrishna The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The vicious cycle of chronic endometriosis and depression—an immunological and physiological perspective Subuhi Sherwani, Mohd Wajid Ali Khan, Saravanan Rajendrasozhan, Khalid Al-Motair, Qayyum Husain, Wahid Ali Khan Frontiers in Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Endometriosis: Future Biological Perspectives for Diagnosis and Treatment Mary Garvey International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(22): 12242. CrossRef
Ultrasound Characteristics and Scanning Techniques of Uterosacral Ligaments for the Diagnosis of Endometriosis Shae Maple, K Jane Chalmers, Eva Bezak, Katelyn Henry, Nayana Parange Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.2023; 42(6): 1193. CrossRef
The Influence of Lactoferrin in Plasma and Peritoneal Fluid on Iron Metabolism in Women with Endometriosis Ewa Skarżyńska, Monika Wróbel, Hanna Zborowska, Mateusz Franciszek Kołek, Grzegorz Mańka, Mariusz Kiecka, Michał Lipa, Damian Warzecha, Robert Spaczyński, Piotr Piekarski, Beata Banaszewska, Artur Jakimiuk, Tadeusz Issat, Wojciech Rokita, Jakub Młodawski, International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(2): 1619. CrossRef
Long Non-Coding RNA SNHG4 Expression in Women with Endometriosis: A Pilot Study Tomasz Szaflik, Hanna Romanowicz, Krzysztof Szyłło, Beata Smolarz Genes.2023; 14(1): 152. CrossRef
Epidemiological and Immune Profile Analysis of Italian Subjects with Endometriosis and Multiple Sclerosis Brunella Zizolfi, Virginia Foreste, Simona Bonavita, Valentina Rubino, Giuseppina Ruggiero, Vincenzo Brescia Morra, Roberta Lanzillo, Antonio Carotenuto, Francesca Boscia, Maurizio Taglialatela, Maurizio Guida Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(5): 2043. CrossRef
Rectal endometriosis imaging: A case based pictorial essay Garvit D. Khatri, Deepashri Basavalingu, Nitin Chaubal, Manjiri Dighe WFUMB Ultrasound Open.2023; 1(1): 100002. CrossRef
KRAS mutations and endometriosis burden of disease Natasha L Orr, Arianne Albert, Yang Doris Liu, Amy Lum, JooYoon Hong, Catalina L Ionescu, Janine Senz, Tayyebeh M Nazeran, Anna F Lee, Heather Noga, Kate Lawrenson, Catherine Allaire, Christina Williams, Mohamed A Bedaiwy, Michael S Anglesio, Paul J Yong The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research.2023; 9(4): 302. CrossRef
The Clinical Presentation of Endometriosis and Its Association to Current Surgical Staging Matilda Shaked Ashkenazi, Ole Linvåg Huseby, Gard Kroken, Marcela Trocha, Aurora Henriksson, Hanna Jasiak, Karen Cuartas, Alessandra Loschiavo, Isabella Kuhn, Dina Støve, Hanna Grindahl, Emilia Latour, Mathias Melbø, Katrine Holstad, Sebastian Kwiatkowski Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(7): 2688. CrossRef
Evaluation and management of endometriosis T. Yoldemir Climacteric.2023; 26(3): 248. CrossRef
COX isozymes and non-uniform neoangiogenesis: What is their role in endometriosis? Andrea Caruana, Charles Savona-Ventura, Jean Calleja-Agius Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators.2023; 167: 106734. CrossRef
Time to move beyond surgical classification systems for endometriosis María Isabel Hernández Cardona, Christana Ajewole, Hannah Lewis, Jorge F. Carrillo, Mario E. Castellanos, Stefanie Barish, Juan Diego Villegas Echeverri, Georgine Lamvu International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics.2023; 163(1): 58. CrossRef
Antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and age as predictors of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) cycle outcomes and blastocyst quality on day 5 in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) A. Arnanz, A. Bayram, I. Elkhatib, A. Abdala, A. El-Damen, R. Patel, B. Lawrenz, L. Melado, H. Fatemi, N. De Munck Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.2023; 40(6): 1467. CrossRef
Association between polymorphisms of cytokine genes and endometriosis: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis Shulin Zhong, Yuzhen Liang, Zhixi Wu, Li Wei Journal of Reproductive Immunology.2023; 158: 103969. CrossRef
Psychological hallmarks of endometriosis with emphasis on sexual dysfunction, stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms Ludek Fiala, Jiri Lenz, Zdenek Adamik, Rachel Sajdlova, Daniela Kestlerova, Vaclav Vetvicka International Clinical Pathology Journal.2023; 10(1): 45. CrossRef
Detection of Endometriosis Lesions Using Gd-Based Collagen I Targeting Probe in Murine Models of Endometriosis Nazanin Talebloo, Maria Ariadna Ochoa Bernal, Elizabeth Kenyon, Christiane L. Mallett, Asgerally Fazleabas, Anna Moore Molecular Imaging and Biology.2023; 25(5): 833. CrossRef
Exosomal microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs: as novel biomarkers for endometriosis Elahe Soltani-Fard, Marzieh Asadi, Sina Taghvimi, Asma Vafadar, Parisa Vosough, Amir Tajbakhsh, Amir Savardashtaki Cell and Tissue Research.2023; 394(1): 55. CrossRef
Use of the Free Endometriosis Risk Advisor App as a Non-Invasive Screening Test for Endometriosis in Patients with Chronic Pelvic Pain and/or Unexplained Infertility Camran Nezhat, Ellie Armani, Hsuan-Chih Carolina Chen, Zahra Najmi, Steven R. Lindheim, Ceana Nezhat Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(16): 5234. CrossRef
Endometriosis: Classification, pathophysiology, and treatment options Elma Pašalić, Murtaza M. Tambuwala, Altijana Hromić-Jahjefendić Pathology - Research and Practice.2023; 251: 154847. CrossRef
Endometriosis Grade 4 in In Vitro Fertilisation and Its Management: A Case Report Abhijeet Raj, Kshiti P Deshpande, Neema Acharya Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Prevalence, Surgical, and Medical Management of Patients with Endometriosis amongst Indian Women Roya Rozati, Wajeeda Tabasum, Mohammed Sarosh Ahmed, Aleem Ahmed Khan, Talia Nazeer Ahmed, Sumaiya Nayela, Salwa Sahar Azimi European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences.2023; 5(6): 101. CrossRef
Endometriosis: An Overview Tanvir Agnihotri, Abheek Ghosh, Ashley Lamba, Charles E. Ray Seminars in Interventional Radiology.2023; 40(06): 544. CrossRef
Comparison of Clinical and Reproductive Outcomes between Adenomyomectomy and Myomectomy Kristyna Hlinecka, Michal Mara, Barbora Boudova, Zdenka Lisa, Adela Richtarova, David Kuzel Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2022; 29(3): 392. CrossRef
Evaluating Surgical Complexity of Endoscopic Hysterectomy: An Inter-rater and Intra-rater Agreement Study of Novel Scoring Tool Meenal Misal, Marlene Girardo, Sadikah Behbehani, Vimee Bindra, Mark R. Hoffman, Wei How Lim, Courtney Martin, Sukrant K. Mehta, Alysha Nensi, Thiers Soares, Deborah Taylor, Steve Wagner, Kelly N. Wright, Megan N. Wasson Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2022; 29(5): 683. CrossRef
MRI in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis and Related Diseases Aki Kido, Yuki Himoto, Yusaku Moribata, Yasuhisa Kurata, Yuji Nakamoto Korean Journal of Radiology.2022; 23(4): 426. CrossRef
Role of Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecology Mireille D. Truong, Lauren N. Tholemeier Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America.2022; 49(2): 273. CrossRef
NLRP3 activated macrophages promote endometrial stromal cells migration in endometriosis Feng Zhou, Fanxuan Zhao, Qianmeng Huang, Xiang Lin, Songying Zhang, Yongdong Dai Journal of Reproductive Immunology.2022; 152: 103649. CrossRef
Endometriosis: A Disease with Few Direct Treatment Options Patricia Ribeiro de Carvalho França, Anna Carolina Pereira Lontra, Patricia Dias Fernandes Molecules.2022; 27(13): 4034. CrossRef
The Role of the Immune System in the Development of Endometriosis Monika Abramiuk, Ewelina Grywalska, Paulina Małkowska, Olga Sierawska, Rafał Hrynkiewicz, Paulina Niedźwiedzka-Rystwej Cells.2022; 11(13): 2028. CrossRef
Transvaginal Ultrasound vs. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Value in Endometriosis Diagnosis Alexandra Baușic, Ciprian Coroleucă, Cătălin Coroleucă, Diana Comandașu, Roxana Matasariu, Andrei Manu, Francesca Frîncu, Claudia Mehedințu, Elvira Brătilă Diagnostics.2022; 12(7): 1767. CrossRef
History of Endometriosis Is Independently Associated with an Increased Risk of Ovarian Cancer Antonio Sarría-Santamera, Zaukiya Khamitova, Arnur Gusmanov, Milan Terzic, Mar Polo-Santos, Miguel A. Ortega, Angel Asúnsolo Journal of Personalized Medicine.2022; 12(8): 1337. CrossRef
Surgical Classification of Endometriosis João Nogueira Neto, Mauricio Simões Abrão, Eduardo Schor, Julio Cesar Rosa-e-Silva Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics.2022; 44(08): 737. CrossRef
Analysis of Long Non-Coding RNA (lncRNA) UCA1, MALAT1, TC0101441, and H19 Expression in Endometriosis Tomasz Szaflik, Hanna Romanowicz, Krzysztof Szyłło, Radosław Kołaciński, Magdalena M. Michalska, Dariusz Samulak, Beata Smolarz International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(19): 11583. CrossRef
Colorectal infiltrating deep endometriosis: Laparoscopic treatment. A case report Giuseppe Di Buono, Matilde Micheli, Gaia Russo, Roberta Vella, Giuseppe Amato, Girolamo Geraci, Antonino Agrusa Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Aged garlic extract as a potential prophylactic to reduce the progression of endometriosis and associated pain burden Emily Redwood, Virginie Lam, Ryusuke Takechi, Deborah Anne Kerr, Connie Jackaman, Arazu Sharif, John Charles Louis Mamo Frontiers in Pain Research.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Histotyping and grading of endometriosis and its association with clinico-pathological parameters Jyothika Litson, Rini Agnes, Gayatri Ravikumar Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.2022; 42(8): 3628. CrossRef
Plasma and Peritoneal Fluid Fibronectin and Collagen IV Levels as Potential Biomarkers of Endometriosis Damian Warzecha, Julia Załęcka, Grzegorz Mańka, Mariusz Kiecka, Michał Lipa, Robert Spaczyński, Piotr Piekarski, Beata Banaszewska, Artur Jakimiuk, Tadeusz Issat, Wojciech Rokita, Jakub Młodawski, Maria Szubert, Piotr Sieroszewski, Grzegorz Raba, Kamil Sz International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(24): 15669. CrossRef
Progestins in the symptomatic management of endometriosis: a meta-analysis on their effectiveness and safety Jon-Benay Mitchell, Sarentha Chetty, Fatima Kathrada BMC Women's Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of CDKN2B-AS1 on cellular proliferation, invasion and AKT3 expression are attenuated by miR-424-5p in a model of ovarian endometriosis Sixue Wang, Mingyu Yi, Xinyue Zhang, Tingting Zhang, Li Jiang, Le Cao, Yuxin Zhou, Xiaoling Fang Reproductive BioMedicine Online.2021; 42(6): 1057. CrossRef
Structured report for dynamic ultrasonography in patients with suspected or known endometriosis: Recommendations of the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy (ISGE) Dusan Djokovic, Patrícia Pinto, Bruno J. van Herendael, Antonio Simone Laganà, Viju Thomas, Jörg Keckstein European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2021; 263: 252. CrossRef
Stigma and Endometriosis: A Brief Overview and Recommendations to Improve Psychosocial Well-Being and Diagnostic Delay Omar T. Sims, Jhumka Gupta, Stacey A. Missmer, Irene O. Aninye International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2021; 18(15): 8210. CrossRef
AAGL 2021 Endometriosis Classification: An Anatomy-based Surgical Complexity Score Mauricio S. Abrao, Marina Paula Andres, Charles E. Miller, Julian A. Gingold, Mariona Rius, Joao Siufi Neto, Francisco Carmona Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2021; 28(11): 1941. CrossRef
Involvement of bradykinin and bradykinin B1 receptor in patients with endometriosis Xin Meng, Ying Li, Qingxue Li, Jian Yang, Mingli An, Xinping Fu, Shuancheng Zhang, Jingwei Chen Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Background Hysterectomy is one of the major gynecologic surgeries. Historically, several surgical procedures have been used for hysterectomy. The present study aims to evaluate the surgical trends and clinical outcomes of hysterectomy performed for benign diseases at the Yeungnam University Hospital.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent a hysterectomy for benign diseases from 2013 to 2018. Data included the patients’ demographic characteristics, surgical indications, hysterectomy procedures, postoperative pathologies, and perioperative outcomes.
Results A total of 809 patients were included. The three major indications for hysterectomy were uterine leiomyoma, pelvic organ prolapse, and adenomyosis. The most common procedure was total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH, 45.2%), followed by open hysterectomy (32.6%). During the study period, the rate of open hysterectomy was nearly constant (29.4%–38.1%). The mean operative time was the shortest in the single-port laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH, 89.5 minutes), followed by vaginal hysterectomy (VH, 96.8 minutes) and TLH (105 minutes). The mean decrease in postoperative hemoglobin level was minimum in single-port LAVH (1.8 g/dL) and VH (1.8 g/dL). Conversion to open surgery or multi-port surgery occurred in five cases (0.6%). Surgical complications including wound dehiscence, organ injuries, and conditions requiring reoperation were observed in 52 cases (6.4%).
Conclusion Minimally invasive approach was used for most hysterectomies for benign diseases, but the rate of open hysterectomy has mostly remained constant. Single-port LAVH and VH showed the most tolerable outcomes in terms of operative time and postoperative drop in hemoglobin level in selected cases.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Analysis of Different Routes of Hysterectomy Based on a Prospective Algorithm and Their Complications in a Tertiary Care Institute Subrat Panda, Ananya Das, Rituparna Das, Nalini Sharma, Wansalan Shullai, Vinayak Jante, Anusuya Sharma, Kaushiki Singh, Prateeti Baruah, Ruksana Makakmayum, Imtiaz Wani Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Background Approximately 100,000 women are diagnosed with cancer each year in Korea. According to a survey by the Korean central cancer registry in 2016, uterine cervical cancer, uterine corpus cancer, and ovarian cancer were the 5th, 7th, and 8th most prevalent cancers respectively among Korean women. The present study aims to review the clinico-pathologic characteristics of patients who were treated for major gynecological malignancies at Yeungnam University Medical Center.
Methods Patients with invasive gynecological cancers from January 2012 to February 2019 were retrospectively identified. We analyzed the clinical features, demographic profiles, pathologic data, treatment modality used, adjuvant treatment used, complications, recurrence, and survival outcomes.
Results A total of 287 patients (cervical cancer 115; corporal cancer 86; and ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer 90) were included. Most cervical (82.7%) and corporal cancers (89.5%) were diagnosed in the early stages (stage I or II), while more than half (58.9%) the cases of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancers were diagnosed in the advanced stages (stage III or IV). Surgical complications were observed in 12.2% of cervical cancers, 16.3% of uterine corpus cancers, and 11.1% of ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was 94.1%, 91.0%, and 77.1% for cervical, corporal, and ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancers, respectively.
Conclusion Surgical treatment was satisfactory in terms of the incidence of complications, and survival outcomes were generally good. Clinicians should be aware of the clinical and histopathological characteristics of patients with gynecological cancers to be able to provide optimal strategies and counseling.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Molecular landscape of recurrent cervical cancer Divya Adiga, Sangavi Eswaran, Deeksha Pandey, Krishna Sharan, Shama Prasada Kabekkodu Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2021; 157: 103178. CrossRef
Histopathological Study of Gynecological Cancers in Patients Admitted to Baqiyatallah Hospital in Tehran during 2011-2019 Seyedeh Razieh Hashemi, Mohammad Reza Akbari, Zahra Soleimani Avicenna Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 28(1): 42. CrossRef
Puerperal sepsis is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Postpartum pelvic infections can cause various complications, including wound infections and necrotizing fasciitis. Several microorganisms are known to cause such infections; however, no study has reported on Staphylococcus caprae, a coagulase-negative staphylococcus that is isolated frequently from animals and infrequently from human specimens, as a causative agent. Here, we report a rare case of septic shock complicated by necrotizing fasciitis after a cesarean section. This is the first report of a human isolate of S. caprae in association with puerperal sepsis and necrotizing fasciitis.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Otitis media aguda supurada por microorganismo inusual Esther Vaquero Sosa, Lucía Martínez de León, Ana Galán García, Alba Miguel Herranz Revista Latinoamericana de Infectología Pediátrica.2024; 37(2): 86. CrossRef
Recently, an increasing interest in less invasive surgery has led to the advent of laparoendoscopic singlesite surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). LESS and NOTES could be technically challenging, but available literature has demonstrated the feasibility and safety of LESS for benign gynecologic diseases. However, the evidence is not strong enough to recommend the use of LESS over that of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MLS). As per the results of the most recently published meta-analysis, the majority of surgical outcomes are equivalent between LESS and MLS, except for the longer operative time in LESS for both adnexal surgery and hysterectomy. Although an increasing number of studies have reported on robotic LESS, NOTES, and LESS for gynecologic malignancy, definite conclusions have not been drawn owing to the lack of sufficient information.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women’s Lives Aslihan Yurtkal, Mujde Canday Journal of Personalized Medicine.2024; 14(3): 265. CrossRef
Comparative study to determine the proper sequence of simulation training, pelvic trainer versus virtual reality simulator: a pilot study Ngima Yangji Sherpa, Ahmed El Minawi, Ahmed N Askalany, Marwa Abdalla Middle East Fertility Society Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Innovative ICG Application in Benign Gynaecological Surgery: Enhancing Safety and Precision Summer Deah Menezes, Tanushree Rao, Kyousuke Takeuchi Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
On the Control and Validation of the PARA-SILSROB Surgical Parallel Robot Doina Pisla, Calin Popa, Alexandru Pusca, Andra Ciocan, Bogdan Gherman, Emil Mois, Andrei-Daniel Cailean, Calin Vaida, Corina Radu, Damien Chablat, Nadim Al Hajjar Applied Sciences.2024; 14(17): 7925. CrossRef
Magnetic Catheter Placement in Neonates: A Handheld Solution to Radiation Exposure and Operational Delays Liam Swanepoel, Alexander Przybysz, Pieter Fourie, Jurgen Kosel Advanced Sensor Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Microgrippers: A Survey and Analysis Liseth V. Pasaguayo, Zeina Al Masry, Sergio Lescano, Noureddine Zerhouni Journal of Medical Devices.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Teres lift-up technique: a retrospective comparative study for an alternative route for laparoscopic entry in gynecologic and oncologic surgery Selim Afsar, Ceyda Sancaklı Usta, Akın Usta, Duygu Lafcı, Izel Gunay, Can Berk Karabudak Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2023; 308(5): 1549. CrossRef
Serosal Injury to a Distended Stomach during Open Entry for Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Pei-Chen Chen, Pei-Chen Li, Hsuan Chen, Dah-Ching Ding Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.2022; 11(2): 121. CrossRef
Laparoscopic single site versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign ovarian masses Xiaoping Jia, Jing Zhou, Yanyan Fu, Hui Wang, Cailing Ma Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences.2022; 15(3): 255. CrossRef
A Facile Magnetic System for Tracking of Medical Devices Liam Swanepoel, Nouf Alsharif, Alexander Przybysz, Pieter Fourie, Pierre Goussard, Mohammad Asadullah Khan, Abdullah Almansouri, Jurgen Kosel Advanced Materials Technologies.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoendoscopic Single Site Hysterectomy: Literature Review and Procedure Description Liliana Mereu, Francesca Dalprà, Saverio Tateo Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(10): 2073. CrossRef
Cervicovaginal reconstruction with small intestinal submucosa graft in congenital cervicovaginal atresia: A report of 38 cases Yan Ding, Xuyin Zhang, Ying Zhang, Fang Shen, Jingxin Ding, Keqin Hua European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2021; 267: 49. CrossRef
Benefícios relacionados à cirurgia minimamente invasiva na ginecologia Isys Holanda Albuquerque de Vasconcelos, Renata Nogueira Andrade, Beatriz Amâncio Rodrigues, Beatriz Leite Assis, Lorenna da Silva Santos, Luana Lemos Alves, Marlon José dos Santos Rosa, Monica Aparecida Miranda Carvalho, Renata Correia Freire, Scanagatt Revista Científica Multidisciplinar Núcleo do Conhecimento.2020; : 28. CrossRef
There has been a significant increase in the number of multiple pregnancies that are associated with a high risk of preterm delivery among Korean women. However, to date, delayed-interval delivery in women with multiple pregnancy is rare. We report a case of delayed-interval delivery performed 128 days after the vaginal delivery of the first fetus in a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy. The patient presented with vaginal leakage of amniotic fluid at 16 weeks of gestation and was diagnosed with a preterm premature rupture of membranes. Three days later, the first twin was delivered, but the neonate died soon after. The second twin remained in utero, and we decided to retain the fetus in utero to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with a preterm birth. The patient was managed with antibiotics and tocolytics. Cervical cerclage was not performed. The second twin was delivered vaginally at 34 weeks and 5 days of gestation, 128 days after the delivery of the first-born fetus. This neonate was healthy and showed normal development during the 1-year follow-up period. Based on our experience with this case, we propose that delayed-interval delivery may improve perinatal survival and decrease morbidity in the second neonate in highly selected cases.