Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Review articles

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL): Jun-Ho Lee; Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021;38(3):175-182. Published online January 19, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2020.00801

7,008 View
173 Download
8 Crossref

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized as CD30 positive and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) negative. In 2016, the World Health Organization declared BIA-ALCL as a new disease entity. The first case of BIA-ALCL was reported in 1997, and as of July 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration had cited a total of 573 United States and global medical device reports of BIA-ALCL, including 33 deaths. In all clinical case reports, except for those with unknown clinical history, the patient had received at least one textured surface breast implant. Although the etiology is not yet clear, chronic inflammation has been proposed as a potential precursor to tumorigenesis. The most common presentation of BIA-ALCL is peri-implant fluid collection following aesthetic or reconstructive implantation with textured surface breast implants. It can be accompanied by breast swelling, asymmetry, pain, skin lesions, lymphadenopathy, and B-type symptoms. Most cases are detected on average 7 to 10 years after implantation. Diagnostic specimens can be obtained with fine-needle aspiration or biopsy. BIA-ALCL is CD30 positive, epithelial membrane antigen positive, and ALK negative. It can be cured with complete surgical excision at the T1–T3 stage.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Smooth vs Textured Expanders: Patient Factors and Anatomic Plane Are Greater Factors in Determining First-Stage Breast Reconstruction Outcomes
Emma S Dahmus, Amanda E Ruffino, Joshua D Madera, Alexandra Long, Shengxuan Wang, Christian A Kauffman, Sean Devitt, Christopher Sanders, Joseph DeSantis
Aesthetic Surgery Journal.2024; 44(2): NP159. CrossRef
Complication Profiles of Smooth vs Textured Tissue Expanders in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Arman J Fijany, Sara C Chaker, Ya-Ching Hung, Ilana Zago, Nicole Friedlich, Sofia E Olsson, Cole A Holan, Lisandro Montorfano, Ronnie N Mubang, Kevin B Givechian, Michael J Boctor, Maxim Pekarev, Jorys Martinez-Jorge, Elizabeth D Slater
Aesthetic Surgery Journal.2024; 44(4): 383. CrossRef
The Polyvalent Role of CD30 for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Adrian Vasile Dumitru, Dana Antonia Țăpoi, Georgian Halcu, Octavian Munteanu, David-Ioan Dumitrascu, Mihail Constantin Ceaușu, Ancuța-Augustina Gheorghișan-Gălățeanu
Cells.2023; 12(13): 1783. CrossRef
Practice Trends in the Management of Asymptomatic Breast Reconstruction Patients with Textured Implants: A Survey Analysis
Laura A. Roider, David C. Nguyen, Shreya Pusapadi Ramkumar, Cody V. Tyson, Herluf G. Lund, Christina M. Plikaitis
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open.2023; 11(7): e5139. CrossRef
Place and objectives of ultrasound examination of the mammary glands after augmentation mammoplasty with silicone endoprostheses in the instrumental algorithm of patients with suspected BIA-ALCL (literature review)
E. P. Fisenko
Medical Visualization.2023; 27(4): 68. CrossRef
Evaluation of Different Breast Implant Shapes in the Same Patient: Is There Really a Difference between Round and Anatomical Implants?
Paolo Montemurro, Patrick Mallucci, Maurizio B. Nava, Per Hedén, William P. Adams, Johannes M. Wagner
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open.2023; 11(9): e5294. CrossRef
Implantes mamarios en tiempos de linfoma y COVID-19. ¿Han aumentado las complicaciones?
Estela Vélez-Benítez, Jesús Cuenca-Pardo, Bertha Torres-Gómez, Arturo Ramírez-Montañana, Raúl Alfonso Vallarta-Rodríguez, Rufino Iribarren-Moreno, Guillermo Ramos-Gallardo, Martín de la Cruz Lira-Álvarez
Cirugía Plástica.2023; 33(3): 100. CrossRef
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Current Knowledge on Breast Implant Associated-Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma
Hyokyung Yoo, Ji-Ung Park, Hak Chang
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2022; 49(02): 141. CrossRef

Prepectoral breast reconstruction: Sung-Eun Kim; Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019;36(3):201-207. Published online August 26, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2019.00283

9,358 View
127 Download
17 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most commonly used reconstruction technique after mastectomy. This is because skin-sparing mastectomy has become possible with advancements in oncology. In addition, the development of breast implants and the advent of acellular dermal matrices have reduced postoperative complications and resulted in superior cosmetic results. The most frequently performed surgical breast reconstruction procedure for the past 20 years was the insertion of an implant under the pectoralis major muscle by means of the dual plane approach. However, some patients suffered from pain and animation deformity caused by muscle manipulation. Recently, a prepectoral approach has been used to solve the above problems in select patients, and the results are similar to subpectoral results. However, this technique is not always chosen due to the number of considerations for successful surgery. In this article, we will discuss the emergence of prepectoral breast reconstruction, indications and contraindications, surgical procedures, and outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The current use of tissue expanders in breast reconstruction: device design, features, and technical considerations
Min-Jeong Cho, Rana V. Farhadi, David W. Nash, Joseph Kaleeny, Stephen P. Povoski, Albert H. Chao
Expert Review of Medical Devices.2024; 21(1-2): 27. CrossRef
The Effect of Early Cultures and Dual-port Expanders on Two-stage, Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: The 25/25 Study
Hunter R. Moyer, Kayla M. Sisson
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open.2024; 12(1): e5507. CrossRef
Current Global Trends in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction
Saima Taj, Ravi Chandavarkar, Raghavan Vidya
Medicina.2024; 60(3): 431. CrossRef
Mastectomy with one-stage or two-stage reconstruction in breast cancer: analysis of early outcomes and patient’s satisfaction
Angela Gurrado, Alessandro Pasculli, Alessia Toma, Michele Maruccia, Rossella Elia, Marco Moschetta, Michele Telegrafo, Giuseppe Massimiliano De Luca, Walter Lavermicocca, Elisabetta Poli, Francesco Paolo Prete, Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella, Giuseppe Giudice,
Updates in Surgery.2023; 75(1): 235. CrossRef
Immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction using an ADM with smooth round implants: A prospective observational cohort study
Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo, Guido Firmani, Guido Paolini, Vittoria Amorosi, Francesca Briganti, Michail Sorotos
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.2023; 80: 56. CrossRef
Optimizing Prepectoral Implant Placement and Concomitant Fat Grafting After Tissue Expansion
Alisa O. Girard, Christopher D. Lopez, Christina M. Ambrosino, Kristen P. Broderick
Annals of Plastic Surgery.2023; 90(6S): S483. CrossRef
A Propensity Score–Matched Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes in Prepectoral Smooth Versus Textured Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
Kevin Perez, Pope Rodnoi, Sumeet S. Teotia, Nicholas T. Haddock
Annals of Plastic Surgery.2023; 90(5S): S242. CrossRef
Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction and Quality of Life: One Step Further
Michael Kontos
Journal of Investigative Surgery.2022; 35(4): 848. CrossRef
Selective Denervation of Pectoralis Major Muscle Improves Cosmetic Outcome and Quality of Life in Retro-Pectoral Implant Based Breast Reconstruction
Marco Bernini, Silvia Sordi, Niccolo’ Bembi, Icro Meattini, Diego De Benedetto, Jacopo Nori Cucchiari, Lorenzo Livi, Lorenzo Orzalesi
Clinical Breast Cancer.2022; 22(1): 60. CrossRef
Meshed Acellular Dermal Matrix for Two-Staged Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: An Institutional Experience
Jessica Luo, Rhett N. Willis, Suzanna M. Ohlsen, Meghan Piccinin, Neal Moores, Alvin C. Kwok, Jayant P. Agarwal
Archives of Plastic Surgery.2022; 49(02): 166. CrossRef
Chances and challenges—analysis of trends in breast reconstruction
Siling Yang, Xixi Lin, Maximilian Kückelhaus, Tobias Hirsch, Marie-Luise Klietz, Matthias M. Aitzetmüller
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery.2022; 75(8): 2584. CrossRef
Cost analysis of pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction
Sachin Chinta, Daniel J. Koh, Nikhil Sobti, Kathryn Packowski, Nikki Rosado, William Austen, Rachel B. Jimenez, Michelle Specht, Eric C. Liao
Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Awake breast cancer surgery: strategy in the beginning of COVID-19 emergency
Gianluca Vanni, Marco Pellicciaro, Marco Materazzo, Mario Dauri, Rolando Maria D’angelillo, Chiara Buonomo, Adriano De Majo, Chiara Pistolese, Ilaria Portarena, Alessandro Mauriello, Francesca Servadei, Erica Giacobbi, Agostino Chiaravalloti, Oreste Claud
Breast Cancer.2021; 28(1): 137. CrossRef
Next-generation surgical meshes for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications: materials, design and emerging manufacturing technologies
Francesca Corduas, Dimitrios A. Lamprou, Elena Mancuso
Bio-Design and Manufacturing.2021; 4(2): 278. CrossRef
Examining the Effects of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Autologous Breast Reconstruction
Ashraf A. Patel, Connor P. Arquette, Pooja S. Yesantharao, Mimi R. Borrelli, Kristen P. Broderick, Jennifer E. Cheesborough, Gordon K. Lee, Rahim S. Nazerali
Annals of Plastic Surgery.2021; 86(5S): S390. CrossRef
Day-case approach to immediate breast reconstruction: pushing the boundaries of ambulatory breast surgery in the post-COVID-19 era
H Shaker, NAR Leena, V Mayers, F Koussa, A Deshpande
The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2021; 103(6): 426. CrossRef
Meta-analysis of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: guide to patient selection and current outcomes
Olivia Abbate, Nikki Rosado, Nikhil Sobti, Brittany L. Vieira, Eric C. Liao
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 182(3): 543. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search