Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Indexed in: ESCI, Scopus, PubMed,
PubMed Central, Embase, CAS, KCI
FREE article processing charge
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "IMRT, 3DCRT, prostate, dose distribution, DVH"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
Radiation Oncology
Dose distribution of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy and 3 Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer
Sung Kyu Kim, Myung Se Kim, Sang Mo Yun
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2007;24(2 Suppl):S538-543.   Published online December 31, 2007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2007.24.2S.S538
  • 2,788 View
  • 3 Download
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose:The aim of this study was to compare the dose distribution of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with 3 dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) in prostate cancer. Materials and Methods:The IMRT plan and the 3DCRT plan used the 9 fields technique, respectively. In IMRT, tumor dose was a total dose of 50 Gy at 2.0 Gy per day, 5 days a week for 5 weeks. All cases were following the dose volume histogram (DVH) constraints. The maximum and minimum tumor dose constraints were 5,075 cGy and 4,925 cGy, respectively. The rectum dose constraints were <35% over 40 Gy. The bladder dose constraints were <35% over 30 Gy. The femur head dose constraints were <15% over 16 Gy. Tumor dose in the 3DCRT were 50 Gy.
Results
:In IMRT, the maximum dose of PTV was 101.9% and minimum dose was 89.5% for given dose. In 3DCRT, the maximum dose of PTV was 103.5% and minimum dose was 86.5% for given dose. The rectum dose was 29.2% over 40 Gy in IMRT compared with 67.9% in 3DCRT. The bladder dose was 30.1% over 30 Gy in IMRT compared with 30.6% in 3DCRT. The right femur head dose was 5.3% over 16 Gy in IMRT compared with 8.3% in 3DCRT. The left femur head dose was 6.8% over 16 Gy in IMRT compared with 9.1% in 3 DCRT.
Conclusion
:The dose of critical organs (rectum, bladder, and femur head) in IMRT showed to reduce than dose of 3DCRT. The rectum dose over 40 Gy in IMRT was reduced 38.7% than 3DCRT. The bladder dose over 30 Gy in IMRT was similar to 3DCRT. The femur head dose over 16 Gy in IMRT was reduced about 2.3∼3% than 3DCRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Changes in Volume Dose by Treatment Plan According to pCT and CBCT in Image-guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Young Jin Won, Jung Hoon Kim
    Journal of Radiological Science and Technology.2018; 41(3): 209.     CrossRef
  • A Comparison between Three Dimensional Radiation Therapy and Intensity Modulated Tadiation Yherapy on Prostate Cancer
    YoungJae Kim, JaeSub Lee, Seongill Hong, HyeJin Ko
    Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology.2013; 7(6): 409.     CrossRef

JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
TOP