Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Indexed in: ESCI, Scopus, PubMed,
PubMed Central, CAS, DOAJ, KCI
FREE article processing charge
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Yeungnam Med Sci > Volume 40(4); 2023 > Article
Original article
Depression, sleep quality, and body image disturbances among pregnant women in India: a cross-sectional study
Kranti S. Kadam1orcid, Aditya R. Anvekar2orcid, Vishnu B. Unnithan3,4,5orcid
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 2023;40(4):394-401.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2023.00087
Published online: May 9, 2023

1Department of Psychiatry, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

2Department of Psychiatry, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

3Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

4ASEAN Youth Coalition against Non-Communicable Diseases, Manila, Philippines

5National Medical Research Association, London, United Kingdom

Corresponding author: Aditya R. Anvekar, MD, DNB Department of Psychiatry, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road, Parel-400012, Mumbai, India Tel: +91-22-24177000 • E-mail: ara814975@gmail.com
• Received: January 23, 2023   • Revised: March 8, 2023   • Accepted: March 18, 2023

Copyright © 2023 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute of Medical Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next
  • 1,826 Views
  • 82 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
  • Background
    Pregnancy is associated with a number of physical, emotional, and biological changes that can exacerbate maternal psychological disturbances, such as body image concerns and depression. Sleep disturbances during pregnancy can also have adverse impacts. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of depression, sleep disturbances, and body image concerns among pregnant women. The study also examined the relationship between these factors and pregnancy-related variables, such as bad obstetric history and whether the pregnancies were unplanned.
  • Methods
    A cross-sectional study of 146 pregnant patients was conducted at a tertiary care center over 15 months. The patients were administered the Beck Depression Inventory, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Body Image Concern Inventory questionnaires. Contingency tables, Fisher exact test, and Spearman correlation were used to identify underlying relationships.
  • Results
    The prevalence of depression was 22.6%. Although body image disturbance was noted in only 2.7% of patients, 46.6% had poor sleep quality. Poor sleep was associated with primigravida status. Bad obstetric history and unplanned pregnancy were associated with depression. Depression was found to be significantly correlated with body image disturbances and poor sleep quality.
  • Conclusion
    Psychiatric disorders were prevalent during pregnancy. This study highlights the importance of screening for depression in pregnant patients. Counselling and caregiver education can be useful for mitigating psychological disturbances. Management of pregnancies by multidisciplinary teams that include psychiatrists could be immensely useful in improving the pregnancy experiences of patients.
Pregnancy is a period of extreme physiological stress in the female body [1]. Besides the hormonal and physical changes that mark each trimester, there is a lot of psychological stress that the woman undergoes in the period leading up to childbirth [2]. The management of disorders in pregnancy becomes greatly challenging because of the added necessity of considering the well-being of the fetus, including drug teratogenicity, while making all therapeutic decisions.
Mood disorders, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, psychosis, and postpartum blues have all been noted during pregnancy, with the severity of depressive symptoms being a cause for concern [2]. Studies in the Indian setting have reported that the prevalence of maternal depression ranges from 9% to 16% [3,4]. Factors such as abusive and traumatic relationships with a lack of intimate partner support can further exacerbate the risk of antenatal depression [5]. The situation becomes graver when it is considered that antenatal depression not only causes complicated deliveries, including preeclampsia, but also leads to premature fetal deliveries, low-birthweight babies, and alterations in the child’s hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis [6-8]. These, in turn, are potent markers of postpartum depression [7].
Although awareness is low even among medical professionals, sleep disorders such as poor sleep quality and insufficient sleep duration are common during pregnancy due to proposed pathophysiological mechanisms including stress system activation, proinflammatory alterations, and the allostatic load hypothesis [9,10]. This predisposition to disordered sleep patterns can result in long-lasting effects in women who are pregnant, with studies indicating that excessive and insufficient sleep quantities are associated with cardiovascular disease and gestational diabetes mellitus [11,12].
Other major concerns during pregnancy are rapidly fluctuating body weight, stretch marks, skin pigmentation, and operative scars, which can greatly affect a woman’s perception of herself [13]. Body image concerns can also negatively affect the initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding, which is essential for neonates, necessitating that these concerns must be addressed in a timely fashion [14]. Although previous independent studies have analyzed the importance of these various facets in pregnancy, there is a gap in the available literature on the complex interplay between body image concerns, antenatal depression, sleep disorders, and their impact on pregnancy trimesters, a lacuna that our study aims to address. The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of depression, sleep disturbances, and body image disturbances among pregnant women. The secondary objectives of the study were to identify the underlying associations and correlations between these clinical variables and pregnancy-related variables such as bad obstetric history and whether the pregnancies were planned.
Ethical statements:Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Seth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital before the study commenced (IEC 2 Approval EC/04/2018). Written informed consent was obtained from the patients.
Considering previous studies on antenatal depression in an Indian setting [3,4], which showed a prevalence of antenatal depression ranging between 9% and 16%, the sample size was calculated at a 5% margin of error and 95% confidence level. Based on the universal sampling formula and planned period of data collection for the study (12 months), a sample size of 146 was targeted. Among the patients attending the antenatal outpatient department managed by the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in a tertiary care hospital, purposive sampling was employed to recruit patients after discussion with the consultant gynecologist. This was a cross-sectional study requiring no additional commitment on the part of the patient, and all women approached for inclusion agreed to be a part of the study. Women who were pregnant and 18 to 45 years were included. Women with or being treated for any preexisting medical, surgical, or psychiatric illness were excluded from the study to reduce confounding factors.
Written informed consent was obtained from the women, and a semi-structured pro forma was used to document the sociodemographic data of the patients and their ages. Details about their pregnancy, including ongoing trimester, gravida status, whether the pregnancy was planned or unplanned, and bad obstetric history were also noted. The patients were subsequently administered the questionnaires described below. All the women returned fully completed questionnaires and thus, 146 patients were selected for the study.
1. Beck Depression Inventory
The Beck Depression Inventory is a self-administered tool used to screen and assess the severity of depression in patients. It has an internal consistency of 0.86, a reliability of 0.93, high sensitivity, and high specificity [15,16]. The scale comprises 21 items, each of which has a list of four statements arranged according to the increasing severity of a particular facet of depression. Individual items are scored from 0 to 3, with a maximum total score of 63. A score of 0 to 10 indicates routine ups and downs and does not suggest depression. Scores between 11 and 16 indicate mild mood disturbance, those between 17 and 20 indicate borderline clinical depression, those between 21 and 30 indicate moderate depression, and scores higher than 30 suggest a clinical diagnosis of severe depression [17].
2. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses the respondent’s sleep quality over the previous month. It includes 19 individual items spread over seven components that measure facets of sleep, including subjective sleep quality, time taken to fall asleep, length of sleep, sleep efficiency measured as the percentage of time in bed that one is asleep, other sleep disturbances, the need for sleeping medications, and any daytime dysfunction. Higher scores are indicative of poorer sleep quality. Items are scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with scores higher than 5 indicating poor sleep [18].
3. Body Image Concern Inventory
The Body Image Concern Inventory is a self-reported scale that evaluates a person’s attitude about their appearance, any tendencies to camouflage perceived defects, and other behaviors, such as seeking validation and avoidance [19]. It comprises 19 items scored on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of body image distortion. Clinically, scores higher than 72 are suggestive of high body image concern with a sensitivity of 96% and validity of 82% [20]. The scale has been noted to be internally consistent with its alpha value, supporting homogeneity [21].
4. Statistical analysis
The final 3 months of the 15 months study period were used for statistical analysis and interpretation of the study results, including write-up. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS ver. 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as means and standard deviations. The association between depression and variables of pregnancy, such as gravida status, bad obstetric history, and whether the pregnancy was planned, was determined using Fisher exact test. Similar associations were determined for body image and sleep disturbances. Correlations between the assessed clinical variables were determined using Spearman correlation coefficient. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The study sample comprised mostly women who were unemployed (58.2%, n=85) (Table 1). Women who were illiterate comprised 21.2% (n=31) of the study population. While most women in our sample were married (79.5%, n=116), only 38.4% (n=56) belonged to joint families. An equal number of primigravida and multigravida made up the study sample, with the ongoing pregnancy being planned in more than half of the cases (58.9%, n=86). Bad obstetric history including abortions and miscarriages was present in 26.0% (n=38) of the women. The mean age of the women in the study sample was 24.60 years (Table 2).
The prevalence of depression was 22.6% (n=33). Another 30.8% (n=45) of the women recorded mild mood disturbances that were not sufficient to meet the diagnosis of ‘depression.’ Among the 33 women who suffered from depression, 11 (7.5%) had borderline clinical depression, five (3.4%) had moderate depression, nine (6.2%) had severe depression, and eight (5.5%) were diagnosed with extreme depression. No mood disturbances were noted in 46.6% (n=68) of the women (Fig. 1).
Nearly half (46.6%, n=68) of the patients experienced sleep disturbances. This poor sleep quality included insomnia and difficulty in falling and staying asleep with frequent nocturnal awakenings. The sleep disturbances were noted across all trimesters of pregnancy. Only 2.7% of patients (n=4) had body image disturbances. No significant association was noted between women in specific pregnancy trimesters and psychological disturbances, including depression, poor sleep, and body image distortion (Table 3). Poor sleep was significantly associated (p=0.03) with primigravida status (Table 4).
While the majority of the women (n=108) did not have any previous miscarriages, 26.0% (n=38) had a bad obstetric history. Bad obstetric history was significantly associated with depression (p<0.0001). Almost half (41.1%, n=60) of the pregnancies were unplanned, whereas 86 pregnancies (58.9%) were planned. Unplanned pregnancies were also significantly associated with depression (p<0.0001) (Table 5). Depression was significantly correlated with the presence of sleep disturbances (p<0.0001, r=0.675) and body image disturbances (p=0.003, r=0.185) (Table 6).
Almost one-fourth (22.6%) of the pregnant women in our study were diagnosed with depression. This aligns with global studies, where the prevalence of prenatal depression has been found to be higher in developing countries. Single-digit prevalence values have been reported in high-income countries [22], in contrast to double-digit prevalence in low-income and low-middle-income countries, which are more likely to be developing countries [23].
Although India is a socially close-knit country [24], a larger number of women were found to live in nuclear families than in joint families, highlighting a shift in household arrangements. With the advent of nuclear families, a couple must now shoulder more responsibilities that were previously distributed among extended family members. This, coupled with the additional demands of pregnancy in the rapidly developing world, naturally results in frequent sleep disturbances. Nearly half of the women in our study (46.6%) reported poor sleep quality.
Only 2.7% of the patients had body image disturbances. This was in contrast to an Asian study where the prevalence of body image disturbances among patients who were pregnant was 34.1% [25]. This can be attributed to the fact that higher social support is observed among Indian families [26]. There is higher acceptance from friends, families, and partners, and this type of perceived social support is helpful in alleviating body image concerns. Higher social support leading to lower levels of body image distress has also been noted in other conditions [27].
The association of these variables (depression, sleep quality, and body image disturbance) with various sociodemographic factors was not found to be significant in our study, indicating that these concerns are not restricted to a specific age group or population subset but rather warrant routine screening among all pregnant patients. Although the literature notes that depression [28], body image disturbances [25], and sleep problems [29] may be associated with age, we did not observe this in our study. Although advanced maternal age may be associated with higher levels of depression, it can also be hypothesized that women with earlier pregnancies are worried about the impact that childbirth can have on their lives and careers, thus leading to a nonsignificant difference in levels of depression noted between the two groups. In previous studies, although low socioeconomic status was also associated with depression and poor sleep quality [30,31], these findings were not observed in our patients.
In our study, there was no significant association between the pregnancy trimester and psychological disturbances, suggesting the need for monitoring and multidisciplinary management throughout pregnancy to detect and prevent the development of any insidious psychopathology. Primigravida status was significantly associated (p=0.03) with poor sleep quality. Pregnancy, a period of intense changes, has often been associated with anxiety [25]. This anxiety, coupled with stress system activation and proinflammatory alterations previously discussed [9,10], significantly impact sleep quality. It is possible that women who are multiparous, having previously gone through the experience, reported higher scores on the sleep quality questionnaire, as they were accustomed to these changes. Women who are primiparous may consider pregnancy to have a much higher impact on their sleep cycle in terms of increased nocturnal awakening, poor sleep quality, and shorter sleep duration. Overall, this highlights that the management of sleep disorders and poor sleep plays an important role in the well-being of pregnant women. Thus, all women should be screened and treated for sleep disturbances during pregnancy.
Although our study did not show a significant association between parity and depression, previous studies on this topic have generated conflicting results. Certain studies [32] indicated that depression is higher in primigravida while other investigators [33] concluded that multigravida had higher levels of depression. However, our findings were consistent with those of an Italian study [34], which also concluded that depression was not associated with the parity status of the mother. Interestingly, another study noted that husbands of multigravida patients experienced higher levels of perinatal depression [35].
Depression during pregnancy was significantly associated with bad obstetric history (p<0.0001) and unplanned pregnancy (p<0.0001). A systematic review also noted the relationship between bad obstetric history and depression [36]. Studies have also shown that unplanned pregnancies are associated with maternal depressive symptoms [37]. Childbirth can be traumatic in these conditions, and previous unpleasant experiences may push the pregnant mothers to develop depressive symptoms.
In addition, depression was found to be significantly correlated with sleep disturbances (p<0.0001) and body image disturbances (p=0.003). Previous studies have noted that alterations in sleep quality may not only lead to depressive symptoms during pregnancy [38] but may also be responsible for postpartum depression in the few weeks following delivery [39]. Patients who are pregnant and extremely conscious about their physical appearance may experience depressive symptoms due to increased appraisal and self-scrutiny of their bodies [40]. Counseling these patients during pregnancy about the need to adopt healthy coping strategies may be very helpful in reinforcing a positive outlook and overcoming vicious cycles of negative thoughts.
Pregnancy is a life-altering period in a woman’s life, and psychiatric counseling for both the patient and her immediate caregivers can play a very important role in alleviating many concerns and fears. Our study highlights the need to screen all pregnant women for depressive symptoms or body image concerns. Early detection of these psychiatric disturbances would ensure prompt management, halting their progression to more severe pathological states that ultimately impact the patient’s life and sleep quality. Our study has a few limitations. It was a cross-sectional design, and no causal relationships were established. The classification of depression severity was based on scores obtained from self-reported questionnaires, which inherently have response biases based on the responding individual. There may also be variations in the presentation of psychological symptoms based on the stage of pregnancy; however, our study broadly classified patients based only on their ongoing trimester at the time of their routine visit, without consideration of the month or week of pregnancy. This detail can provide additional insight into the initial and final months; however, this was beyond the scope of the current study. This paper lays the groundwork for the establishment of cross-disciplinary management protocols for pregnancy, and future studies designed with these recommendations in mind will pave the way for the establishment of clearly outlined evidence-based holistic healthcare for pregnant women. Future multicenter interventional studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to collect regular follow-up data.
The pregnant patients commonly had underlying psychiatric disturbances, such as depression and body image disturbances, for which no professional help was made available due to missed diagnoses. Poor sleep quality was significantly associated with primigravida status. Bad obstetric history and unplanned pregnancy were found to be associated with depression. Patients who experienced depressive symptoms were likely to have poor sleep quality and body image concerns during pregnancy. Screening, counseling, and caregiver education could be useful tools to ensure that pregnancy is a better experience for the patients’ families. To this end, pregnancies should be managed by multidisciplinary teams that also include psychiatrists to ensure the provision of holistic care.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology: KSK, ARA, VBU; Data curation: KSK, VBU; Project administration, Supervision: KSK; Visualization: ARA, VBU; Writing-original draft: ARA, VBU; Writing-review & editing: KSK, ARA, VBU.

Fig. 1.
Prevalence of depression across the trimesters of pregnancy.
jyms-2023-00087f1.jpg
Table 1.
Sociodemographic characteristics and pregnancy-related variables of the population (n=146)
Characteristic Data
Sociodemographic variable
 Marital status
  Married 116 (79.5)
  Unmarried 9 (6.1)
  Divorced/separated 21 (14.4)
 Educational status
  Illiterate 31 (21.2)
  Primary 29 (19.9)
  Secondary 33 (22.6)
  Higher secondary 31 (21.2)
  Graduate and above 22 (15.1)
 Occupational status
  Unemployed 85 (58.2)
  Unskilled worker 13 (8.9)
  Semi-skilled worker 14 (9.6)
  Skilled worker 34 (23.3)
 Family type
  Joint 56 (38.4)
  Nuclear 90 (61.6)
Pregnancy-related variable
 Gravida status
  Primigravida 73 (50.0)
  Multigravida 73 (50.0)
 Nature of pregnancy
  Planned 86 (58.9)
  Unplanned 60 (41.1)
 Bad obstetric history
  Present 38 (26.0)
  Absent 108 (74.0)

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 2.
Mean values of the population (n=146)
Parameter Data
Age (yr) 26.40±4.07
BDI score 8.67±14.04
BICI 23.15±10.43
PSQI 5.34±3.44

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BICI, Body Image Concern Inventory; PSQI, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index.

Table 3.
Distribution of clinical variables based on trimester
Variable First trimester (n=49)
Second trimester (n=49)
Third trimester (n=48)
p-valuea)
Present Absent Present Absent Present Absent
Depression 8 (16.3) 41 (83.7) 13 (26.5) 36 (73.5) 12 (25.0) 36 (75.0) 0.44
Poor sleep 19 (38.8) 30 (61.2) 22 (44.9) 27 (55.1) 27 (56.3) 21 (43.7) 0.22
Body image disturbance 0 (0) 49 (100) 1 (2.0) 48 (98.0) 3 (6.3) 45 (93.7) 0.08

Values are presented as number (%).

a) Analyzed by the Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact square test; two-tailed p-value of <0.05 indicates the statistical significance.

Table 4.
Comparison of clinical variables with gravida status
Variable Primigravida (n=73)
Multigravida (n=73) p-valuea)
Present Absent Present Absent
Depression 13 (17.8) 60 (82.2) 20 (27.4) 53 (72.6) 0.23
Poor sleep 41 (56.2) 32 (43.8) 27 (37.0) 46 (63.0) 0.03*

Values are presented as number (%).

a) Analyzed by the Fisher exact square test.

* p<0.05, statistically significant.

Table 5.
Association of depression with variables of pregnancy
Variable No. of subjects Present Absent p-valuea)
Planned pregnancy <0.0001*
 Yes 86 12 (14.0) 74 (86.0)
 No 60 21 (35.0) 39 (65.0)
Bad obstetric history <0.0001*
 Yes 38 18 (47.4) 20 (52.6)
 No 108 15 (13.9) 93 (86.1)

Values are presented as number only or number (%).

a) Analyzed by the Fisher exact square test.

* p<0.05, statistically significant.

Table 6.
Correlation of depression with other clinical variables
Variable correlated with depression p-value r-value
Sleep disturbance <0.0001* 0.6752
Body image disturbance 0.0025* 0.1854

* p<0.05, statistically significant.

  • 1. Williams D. Pregnancy: a stress test for life. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2003;15:465–71.ArticlePubMed
  • 2. Van Mullem C, Tillett J. Psychiatric disorders in pregnancy. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2009;23:124–30.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Hegde SS, Pai KK, Sandeep K. Prevalence of antenatal depression and gender preference: a cross sectional study among Mangalore population, Karnataka, India. J Pharm Biomed Sci 2013;30:1011–4.
  • 4. George C, Lalitha AR, Antony A, Kumar AV, Jacob KS. Antenatal depression in coastal South India: prevalence and risk factors in the community. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2016;62:141–7.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 5. Varma D, Chandra PS, Thomas T, Carey MP. Intimate partner violence and sexual coercion among pregnant women in India: relationship with depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. J Affect Disord 2007;102:227–35.ArticlePubMed
  • 6. Yin X, Sun N, Jiang N, Xu X, Gan Y, Zhang J, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of antenatal depression: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Psychol Rev 2021;83:101932.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Oren DA, Wisner KL, Spinelli M, Epperson CN, Peindl KS, Terman JS, et al. An open trial of morning light therapy for treatment of antepartum depression. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159:666–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Accortt EE, Cheadle AC, Dunkel Schetter C. Prenatal depression and adverse birth outcomes: an updated systematic review. Matern Child Health J 2015;19:1306–37.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 9. Colten HR, Altevogt BM. Sleep disorders and sleep deprivation: an unmet public health problem. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2006.
  • 10. Palagini L, Gemignani A, Banti S, Manconi M, Mauri M, Riemann D. Chronic sleep loss during pregnancy as a determinant of stress: impact on pregnancy outcome. Sleep Med 2014;15:853–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Kim Y, Wilkens LR, Schembre SM, Henderson BE, Kolonel LN, Goodman MT. Insufficient and excessive amounts of sleep increase the risk of premature death from cardiovascular and other diseases: the Multiethnic Cohort Study. Prev Med 2013;57:377–85.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 12. Wang H, Leng J, Li W, Wang L, Zhang C, Li W, et al. Sleep duration and quality, and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in pregnant Chinese women. Diabet Med 2017;34:44–50.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 13. Mehta UJ, Siega-Riz AM, Herring AH. Effect of body image on pregnancy weight gain. Matern Child Health J 2011;15:324–32.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 14. Brown A, Rance J, Warren L. Body image concerns during pregnancy are associated with a shorter breast feeding duration. Midwifery 2015;31:80–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 15. Adewuya AO, Ola BA, Aloba OO. Prevalence of major depressive disorders and a validation of the Beck Depression Inventory among Nigerian adolescents. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2007;16:287–92.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 16. Ibeneme SC, Nwosu AO, Ibeneme GC, Bakare MO, Fortwengel G, Limaye D. Distribution of symptoms of post-stroke depression in relation to some characteristics of the vulnerable patients in socio-cultural context. Afr Health Sci 2017;17:70–8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 17. Amaricai E, Poenaru DV. The post-stroke depression and its impact on functioning in young and adult stroke patients of a rehabilitation unit. J Ment Health 2016;25:137–41.ArticlePubMed
  • 18. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193–213.ArticlePubMed
  • 19. Ghadakzadeh S, Ghazipour A, Khajeddin N, Karimian N, Borhani M. Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI) for identifying patients with BDD seeking rhinoplasty: using a Persian (Farsi) version. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2011;35:989–94.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 20. Littleton HL, Axsom D, Pury CL. Development of the body image concern inventory. Behav Res Ther 2005;43:229–41.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Littleton H, Breitkopf CR. The Body Image Concern Inventory: validation in a multiethnic sample and initial development of a Spanish language version. Body Image 2008;5:381–8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 22. Pajulo M, Savonlahti E, Sourander A, Helenius H, Piha J. Antenatal depression, substance dependency and social support. J Affect Disord 2001;65:9–17.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Humayun A, Haider II, Imran N, Iqbal H, Humayun N. Antenatal depression and its predictors in Lahore, Pakistan. East Mediterr Health J 2013;19:327–32.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Kadam KS, Anvekar S, Angane AY, Unnithan VB. The silent survivor: a cross-sectional study of domestic violence, perceived stress, coping strategies, and suicidal risk in the wives of patients with alcohol use disorder. Indian J Soc Psychiatry 2022;38:188–94.Article
  • 25. Roomruangwong C, Kanchanatawan B, Sirivichayakul S, Maes M. High incidence of body image dissatisfaction in pregnancy and the postnatal period: associations with depression, anxiety, body mass index and weight gain during pregnancy. Sex Reprod Healthc 2017;13:103–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 26. Kadam KS, Bagal RP, Angane AY, Ghorpade GS, Anvekar AR, Unnithan VB. A cross-sectional study of quality of life, psychiatric illness, perceived social support, suicidal risk and selfesteem among patients with burns. J Family Med Prim Care 2021;10:432–8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 27. Spatuzzi R, Vespa A, Lorenzi P, Miccinesi G, Ricciuti M, Cifarelli W, et al. Evaluation of social support, quality of life, and body image in women with breast cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2016;11:28–32.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 28. Zeng K, Li Y, Yang R. The mediation role of psychological capital between family relationship and antenatal depressive symptoms among women with advanced maternal age: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:488.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 29. Duke CH, Williamson JA, Snook KR, Finch KC, Sullivan KL. Association between fruit and vegetable consumption and sleep quantity in pregnant women. Matern Child Health J 2017;21:966–73.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 30. Oboro OF, Ebulue V, Oboro VO, Ohenhen V, Oyewole A, Akindele R, et al. The magnitude and determinants of depressive symptoms amongst women in early pregnancy in Southern Nigeria: a cross-sectional study. S Afr J Psychiatr 2022;28:1691.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 31. Okun ML, Tolge M, Hall M. Low socioeconomic status negatively affects sleep in pregnant women. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2014;43:160–7.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 32. Wyatt S, Ostbye T, De Silva V, Lakmali P, Long Q. Predictors and occurrence of antenatal depressive symptoms in Galle, Sri Lanka: a mixed-methods cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021;21:758.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 33. Martínez-Galiano JM, Hernández-Martínez A, Rodríguez-Almagro J, Delgado-Rodríguez M, Gómez-Salgado J. Relationship between parity and the problems that appear in the postpartum period. Sci Rep 2019;9:11763.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 34. Bassi M, Delle Fave A, Cetin I, Melchiorri E, Pozzo M, Vescovelli F, et al. Psychological well-being and depression from pregnancy to postpartum among primiparous and multiparous women. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2017;35:183–95.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Chen YH, Huang JP, Au HK, Chen YH. High risk of depression, anxiety, and poor quality of life among experienced fathers, but not mothers: a prospective longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 2019;242:39–47.ArticlePubMed
  • 36. Fekadu Dadi A, Miller ER, Mwanri L. Antenatal depression and its association with adverse birth outcomes in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2020;15:e0227323.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 37. Moreau C, Bonnet C, Beuzelin M, Blondel B. Pregnancy planning and acceptance and maternal psychological distress during pregnancy: results from the National Perinatal Survey, France, 2016. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:162.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 38. Goyal D, Gay CL, Lee KA. Patterns of sleep disruption and depressive symptoms in new mothers. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2007;21:123–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 39. Wolfson AR, Crowley SJ, Anwer U, Bassett JL. Changes in sleep patterns and depressive symptoms in first-time mothers: last trimester to 1-year postpartum. Behav Sleep Med 2003;1:54–67.ArticlePubMed
  • 40. Cash TF. The treatment of body image disturbances. In: Thompson J, editors. Body image, eating disorders, and obesity: an integrative guide for assessment and treatment. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 1996. p. 83–107.

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  
    • Melatonin improves maternal sleep deprivation‐induced learning and memory impairment, inflammation, and synaptic dysfunction in murine male adult offspring
      Yue‐Ming Zhang, Ru‐Meng Wei, Zong‐Yin Li, Xue‐Yan Li, Kai‐Xuan Zhang, Yi‐Jun Ge, Xiao‐Yi Kong, Xue‐Chun Liu, Gui‐Hai Chen
      Brain and Behavior.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef

    Figure
    • 0
    Related articles
    Depression, sleep quality, and body image disturbances among pregnant women in India: a cross-sectional study
    Image
    Fig. 1. Prevalence of depression across the trimesters of pregnancy.
    Depression, sleep quality, and body image disturbances among pregnant women in India: a cross-sectional study
    Characteristic Data
    Sociodemographic variable
     Marital status
      Married 116 (79.5)
      Unmarried 9 (6.1)
      Divorced/separated 21 (14.4)
     Educational status
      Illiterate 31 (21.2)
      Primary 29 (19.9)
      Secondary 33 (22.6)
      Higher secondary 31 (21.2)
      Graduate and above 22 (15.1)
     Occupational status
      Unemployed 85 (58.2)
      Unskilled worker 13 (8.9)
      Semi-skilled worker 14 (9.6)
      Skilled worker 34 (23.3)
     Family type
      Joint 56 (38.4)
      Nuclear 90 (61.6)
    Pregnancy-related variable
     Gravida status
      Primigravida 73 (50.0)
      Multigravida 73 (50.0)
     Nature of pregnancy
      Planned 86 (58.9)
      Unplanned 60 (41.1)
     Bad obstetric history
      Present 38 (26.0)
      Absent 108 (74.0)
    Parameter Data
    Age (yr) 26.40±4.07
    BDI score 8.67±14.04
    BICI 23.15±10.43
    PSQI 5.34±3.44
    Variable First trimester (n=49)
    Second trimester (n=49)
    Third trimester (n=48)
    p-valuea)
    Present Absent Present Absent Present Absent
    Depression 8 (16.3) 41 (83.7) 13 (26.5) 36 (73.5) 12 (25.0) 36 (75.0) 0.44
    Poor sleep 19 (38.8) 30 (61.2) 22 (44.9) 27 (55.1) 27 (56.3) 21 (43.7) 0.22
    Body image disturbance 0 (0) 49 (100) 1 (2.0) 48 (98.0) 3 (6.3) 45 (93.7) 0.08
    Variable Primigravida (n=73)
    Multigravida (n=73) p-valuea)
    Present Absent Present Absent
    Depression 13 (17.8) 60 (82.2) 20 (27.4) 53 (72.6) 0.23
    Poor sleep 41 (56.2) 32 (43.8) 27 (37.0) 46 (63.0) 0.03*
    Variable No. of subjects Present Absent p-valuea)
    Planned pregnancy <0.0001*
     Yes 86 12 (14.0) 74 (86.0)
     No 60 21 (35.0) 39 (65.0)
    Bad obstetric history <0.0001*
     Yes 38 18 (47.4) 20 (52.6)
     No 108 15 (13.9) 93 (86.1)
    Variable correlated with depression p-value r-value
    Sleep disturbance <0.0001* 0.6752
    Body image disturbance 0.0025* 0.1854
    Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and pregnancy-related variables of the population (n=146)

    Values are presented as number (%).

    Table 2. Mean values of the population (n=146)

    Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

    BDI, Beck Depression Inventory; BICI, Body Image Concern Inventory; PSQI, Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index.

    Table 3. Distribution of clinical variables based on trimester

    Values are presented as number (%).

    Analyzed by the Freeman-Halton extension of the Fisher exact square test; two-tailed p-value of <0.05 indicates the statistical significance.

    Table 4. Comparison of clinical variables with gravida status

    Values are presented as number (%).

    Analyzed by the Fisher exact square test.

    p<0.05, statistically significant.

    Table 5. Association of depression with variables of pregnancy

    Values are presented as number only or number (%).

    Analyzed by the Fisher exact square test.

    p<0.05, statistically significant.

    Table 6. Correlation of depression with other clinical variables

    p<0.05, statistically significant.


    JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
    TOP