Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science

Indexed in: ESCI, Scopus, PubMed,
PubMed Central, CAS, DOAJ, KCI
FREE article processing charge
OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > J Yeungnam Med Sci > Volume 42; 2025 > Article
Communications
Physical therapy, Sports therapy, and Rehabilitation
The feasibility of conducting successful pulmonary rehabilitation in India
Manivel Arumugam1orcid, Senthilkumar Ramasamy2orcid, Pitchaimani Govindharaj3orcid, Mahendran Murugan4orcid
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science 2025;42:40.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12701/jyms.2025.42.40
Published online: June 28, 2025

1Department of Physical Therapy, Medical City Hospital for Military and Security Services-Muscat, Oman

2Research Department, Vedanta Medical Research Foundation (BALCO Medical Centre), Naya Raipur, India

3Department of Allied Health, Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Chennai, India

4Department of Physiotherapy, Rumailah Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar

Corresponding author: Pitchaimani Govindharaj, BPT, M.Sc, PhD Sri Ramachandra Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Tel: • E-mail: pitchaimani.g@sriramachandra.edu.in
• Received: May 16, 2025   • Revised: June 18, 2025   • Accepted: June 23, 2025

© 2025 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute of Medical Science

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 2,720 Views
  • 134 Download
  • Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a highly effective evidence-based treatment with multidisciplinary and comprehensive individualized interventions that reduce morbidity by improving functional capacity and managing respiratory symptoms. It can contribute to overall wellness, reduce symptoms related to respiratory conditions, and facilitate routine work and social activities. Hence, it is a vital component of integrated care for patients with chronic respiratory diseases. In India, PR faces several challenges arising from patients, society, and hospitals. Recent evidence suggests that PR has significant benefits in chronic respiratory diseases, including reduced morbidity and mortality, improved quality of life, and cost savings. Nevertheless, it has been significantly underutilized and has not received the necessary attention in India. The lack of proper utilization of PR can be attributed to several factors, including a lack of awareness and understanding among healthcare professionals regarding its advantages, insufficient referrals to PR programs, scarcity of specialized professionals trained in PR, and a general lack of awareness among patients about its benefits. This article aims to outline the obstacles to PR, identify the factors that influence its successful implementation, and propose possible solutions to overcome these barriers.
Among noncommunicable diseases (NCDs), chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) account for considerable burden and are a major cause of premature mortality worldwide [1]. The umbrella term CRDs includes chronic diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, and lung cancer. The most common diseases are asthma and COPD, with global prevalence rates of 6.2% and 4.9%, respectively [2]. These chronic conditions are difficult to treat, reduce lifespan, and compromise quality of life. The global burden of disease survey data from 1990 to 2016 have shown that low-middle income countries (LMICs) bear a disproportionate burden of death and disability. The World Health Organization has shown that almost 90% of COPD deaths occur in LMICs, and recent estimates show that COPD will be one of the leading causes of death globally and in India by 2030 [3,4].
At present, various forms of treatment are available that help reduce symptoms, prevent deterioration, and improve quality of life. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) aim to reduce premature mortality from NCDs, including CRDs, by one-third by 2030 [5]. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is crucial in managing CRDs, aiming to reduce symptoms, improve participation and functional status, reduce health expenditure, and improve quality of life [6,7]. PR comprises several elements: patient assessment, maximizing the benefits of medical treatment, physical exercise, understanding self-care and disease management, dietary support, and psychosocial support [8,9]. Exercise training plays a pivotal role in developing effective PR strategies [10].
In India, there are various implementation-related challenges for PR rooted in patients, society, and hospital practices. Rehabilitation services are lacking, particularly in LMICs. More than 50% of patients do not receive the rehabilitation services that they need, and the current prevention modalities are not adequate and are unsuccessful in reducing the severity of the disease or related disability [11]. An integrated approach to the prevention and management of CRDs is required to achieve SDG targets. Hence, this review discusses the factors that determine the feasibility of implementing successful PR programs in India.
PR is a comprehensive intervention program that aims to increase the physical and psychological well-being of patients and promote their lasting adherence to health-enhancing behaviors [8]. It can be delivered in inpatient, outpatient, and home settings. Each setting has its own benefits and drawbacks in terms of convenience for participants, cost of services, available resources, and societal-level opportunities [6,9,10]. Efficient and safe PR programs [12] require an appropriate environment and multidisciplinary teams to provide effective care.
PR should be provided in a multidisciplinary context by physicians and other healthcare professionals (e.g., physiotherapists, occupational therapists, rehabilitation nurses, exercise physiologists, respiratory therapists, psychologists, behavioral specialists, nutritionists, and social workers). The specific professional requirements vary among rehabilitation programs [10,13].
Most patients are referred for PR when they have symptoms of dyspnea causing disability and an inability to perform activities of daily living. Research has shown that PR is beneficial for patients of all ages and at all disease severity levels, with strong evidence supporting its advantages [14-16]. Unfortunately, many individuals are not referred to PR until their condition advances to a later stage. Apart from this, there are other risk factors for the development of pulmonary diseases such as smoking, environmental exposures, occupational dust and chemicals, allergies, asthma, and genetic history related to cystic fibrosis and α1-antitrypsin, while some gestational and childhood factors should also be considered. Other conditions characterized by respiratory symptoms should not be excluded from PR programs [17-19].
According to the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation [10], a complete PR program includes the following components (Fig. 1): (1) patient evaluation and goal establishment, (2) exercise-based evaluation and training, (3) education on self-management, (4) dietary intervention, and (5) management of psychosocial aspects.
1. Patient assessment and goal setting
Patient assessment is an integral part of individualized PR programs; each patient is different and deserves a tailored plan. Primary assessment with a comprehensive health history review by reading medical records and personal interviews provides a snapshot of the disease course and comorbidities. Such an assessment includes an accurate interpretation of pulmonary diagnostic tests such as the 6-minute walk test, exercise testing, pulmonary function tests, arterial blood gas analysis, and imaging. A review of diagnostic tests provides details about the treatment plans and adjuncts to treatment (i.e., supplemental oxygen, exercise tolerance, and special precautions for exercise).
Creating a welcoming environment and conducting thorough patient interviews are crucial for establishing a sense of ease with the staff and the rehabilitation environment. This approach can help alleviate fears about therapy, foster open communication, build trust, and establish a positive relationship between the patient and the rehabilitation team. These factors are key to gathering information for symptom assessment, including dyspnea, fatigue, coughing with productive sputum, wheezing, chest discomfort, gastroesophageal reflux, pain, anxiety, and depression.
2. Exercise and functional training
Exercise training encompasses various components such as resistance/strength training, chest physiotherapy for breathing and airway clearance, cardiovascular endurance training, inspiratory muscle training, and flexibility training. Chest physiotherapy techniques consist of postural drainage, chest percussion, vibration, and directed cough, as well as breath retraining exercises such as diaphragmatic breathing and pursed-lip breathing. Additionally, energy conservation strategies such as efficient eating, stair climbing, and proper body positioning may be recommended during these sessions.
Endurance exercise training, such as cycling or walking, is the most commonly used form of exercise [20-22]. Lower extremity exercises often involve treadmill walking or cycling, whereas upper extremity exercises may include arm ergometry, arm weightlifting, or throwing. According to the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines, individuals with CRD should participate in endurance exercise training three to five times per week. The target training intensity is typically based on a modified Borg dyspnea or fatigue scale [23]. Interval training, which alternates between high-intensity exercise and rest periods or lower-intensity exercise, is another option. Even individuals with severe COPD and cachexia may benefit from interval training because it can lead to reduced symptom scores while maintaining the training effects of endurance exercise [24-27].
Resistance/strength training is essential for adults to promote healthy aging and has been shown to be beneficial for individuals with chronic respiratory conditions, such as COPD, who often have reduced muscle mass and strength compared to healthy individuals [28-30]. According to the American College of Sports Medicine, adults should perform up to three sets of eight to 12 repetitions of resistance exercises 2 or 3 days per week to increase muscle strength. The initial loads should be set at 60% to 70% of the one-repetition maximum or a weight that causes fatigue after eight to 12 repetitions. Given that upper limb function is crucial for daily activities in individuals with CRDs, upper limb training is typically included in exercise routines [31].
Flexibility training is a key element of various exercise programs, including those used in PR. Postural abnormalities can contribute to reduced pulmonary function, diminished quality of life, decreased bone mineral density, and heightened respiratory effort, leading to back pain, which may affect breathing mechanics [32,33]. It is advisable to include upper- and lower-body flexibility exercises in the regimen at least two to three times per week. Studies have shown that neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can improve limb muscle strength and exercise capacity and reduce dyspnea in stable outpatients with severe COPD and low initial exercise tolerance [34,35]. Furthermore, the use of NMES has been proposed during acute COPD exacerbations [36,37].
3. Psychosocial intervention
Patient psychosocial well-being is a key factor in the customization of educational and exercise interventions. Anxiety and depression are common in chronic respiratory conditions and lead to increased morbidity and mortality risks [38]. Psychosocial support such as disability evaluation, vocational guidance, and ongoing education for patients and families is essential. PR has been shown to effectively alleviate anxiety and depression in patients with COPD [39].
4. Nutritional interventions
Nutritional interventions are essential because patients with respiratory diseases frequently have symptoms of nutritional impact (e.g., anorexia and early satiety). Patients with CRD may lose weight and have higher resting energy expenditure owing to factors such as systemic inflammation, tissue hypoxia, medications, restricted dietary intake, higher respiratory muscle resistive load, and catabolic/anabolic ratios [40]. Based on each patient’s assessment, the nutritionist will provide adequate education regarding diet to the patient and caregiver.
5. Self-management education
Self-management education is a key element in managing the condition of the patient and improving their quality of life [41]. Assessing the patient’s understanding and management of their condition is important. The physiotherapist will create an educational plan and assess progress following the intervention. Educational topics may include the anatomy and pathophysiology of CRDs, disease-specific information, medication management, oxygen use, airway clearance techniques, breathing exercises, and postures for symptom relief.
Many barriers have been identified in PR programs. Even the most recognized rehabilitation centers have a completion rate ranging between 50% and 80% [42,43], and adherence to PR is even lower in well-developed countries. In India, numerous challenges have been identified regarding institutional-, patient-, and society-based factors when establishing and delivering a PR program.
For non-completion, the major issues include the presence of illness and comorbidities, distance of travel and transportation, lack of awareness, smoking, psychological symptoms, lack of support, deprivation, and perceived impairment [44,45]. In India, most of the population resides in rural rather than urban areas; consequently, if these individuals want to participate in a PR program, they must consider travel, assistance, and the economic burden.
Very few professionals and organizations deliver PR, which is mostly available in well-established institutions and hospitals located in developed cities and is sparse in small cities and towns. Medical professionals may not fully appreciate the benefits of PR due to limited exposure to its concepts and usefulness during training, which could result in delays in referral during medical practice [46].
This article identified the barriers as awareness barriers (Table 1 [45,47-50]), practical barriers (Table 2), and socioeconomic barriers (Table 3 [42,46,50,51]) and suggested potential elements to overcome these obstacles to the development of PR.
In India, rules and policies related to PR are still at an embryonic stage and have not been fully integrated into the healthcare system. Some regions have limited coverage for PR programs and long-term oxygen therapy, even from health insurance companies. Patients in India often must navigate through these services on their own, unlike in some countries where healthcare is fully government-funded. There is a need to establish more public relation-specific centers throughout the country.
Awareness of the benefits of PR programs is increasing. Larger cities and specialty hospitals have already placed a certain degree of focus on it. Rural areas and their healthcare facilities must begin to promote PR concepts. Starting a PR program with limited resources and then expanding the facility over time will help lower healthcare usage and enhance the quality of life of patients with chronic respiratory conditions in the long term [50].
PR is an essential component of holistic care for individuals with chronic respiratory conditions. It is integral to achieving universal health coverage and is a vital tool for advancing SDGs. The positive effects and advantages of PR are well-established. However, additional efforts should be made to address the challenges and obstacles affecting the feasibility and implementation of PR in the Indian healthcare system and among healthcare professionals and patients. Much work remains to be done to address these factors in the field of PR in India. Overcoming these barriers will lead to better outcomes in patients with CRDs.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank Dr. Narasimman Swaminathan, Professor at the School of Rehabilitation and Medical Sciences, University of Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman, for his guidance, support, and encouragement. We also thank the staff of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, PSG Hospitals, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, for their support.

Funding

None.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Formal analysis, and Supervision: MA, PG; Data curation, Methodology, and Investigation: MA; Writing–original draft: MA; Writing–review & editing: SR, PG, MM.

Fig. 1.
Components of pulmonary rehabilitation. BODE, body mass Index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity; CRQ, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; SF-36, Short Form-36 Health Survey; VO2, volume of oxygen consumption; ABG, arterial blood gas analysis; BMI, body mass index.
jyms-2025-42-40f1.jpg
Table 1.
Awareness barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in India
Barrier to PR
Factor to overcome the barrier
Professional [47] Patient [48] Professional Patient [45]
· Medical and allied professionals lack awareness and low acceptance of the beneficial effects of PR · Lack of awareness among patients about rehabilitation, as they mostly rely on medications for symptomatic relief · Incorporate PR into the undergraduate and post-graduate programs for medical, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and nursing fields · Motivation is essential for a successful rehabilitation program
· They are not adequately exposed to related concepts and benefits during undergraduate and post-graduate education, or later in clinical practice. This lack of knowledge often delays referring patients to rehabilitation services · They are referred to a rehabilitation program at an advanced stage of disease when symptoms are severe and activities of daily living impaired. Under such circumstances, patients are exhausted, depressed, and ignore rehabilitation · Adequate training in the PR unit to see all types of patients, their adherence to the program, and beneficial outcomes · Patients and caregivers should receive regular education about the program and its positive results
· The focus is primarily on establishing regular outpatient clinics, emergency departments, and intensive care units, leading to delays in hiring staff explicitly trained for PR assessments. Additionally, there is a lack of research reports on PR and its outcomes · At least they must include a minimal exercise-based intervention along with their regular medications to promote regular activities of daily living · If financial constraints are the main issue, telerehabilitation and at-home activities should be implemented [50]
· Full-fledged center with adequate equipment is essential [49] · It should be highlighted that rehabilitation is more cost-effective than standard services
· Physiotherapy curriculum should be enriched with specific training for a minimum of 3–6 months [45]
· Conducting and publishing research related to PR will create more positive advances towards appropriate referrals
Table 2.
Practical barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in India
Barrier to PR
Factor to overcome the barrier
Referral Oxygen and instrument availability Staffing Advertisement Referral Oxygen and instrument availability Staffing Advertisement
· Medication is preferred for symptomatic relief; wrong diagnosis leads to a delay in referral · Patients frequently lack the willingness or ability to afford the costs associated with home oxygen, equipment, or attending rehabilitative sessions · A multidisciplinary team is essential when setting up the PR program with regular practice · Lack of advertising about PR on social media · Referral should be initiated with proper diagnosis and its potential outcomes with rehabilitation program · Patients can be advised to purchase an oxygen concentrator for long-term use at an affordable cost · The multidisciplinary PR team enables collaboration and includes driven professionals from various fields with specialized knowledge in chronic respiratory care. The team can start with a smaller number of members and expand as they become proficient in providing the necessary elements of PR · Positive impact of rehabilitation program can be published through social media and internet
· Patients are referred after finding difficulties with their regular routine · Healthcare institutions must spend more money on purchasing equipment required for rehabilitation, infrastructure maintenance, and instrumentation · Recruiting, training, and maintaining staff adequately is crucial; this could become difficult to manage · Many institutions and hospitals also do not display or advertise the program · Even with respiratory failure, patients can be referred with precaution to PR under strict supervision and medical monitoring · PR can involve home-based exercise using ordinary objects such as bicycles, water bottles, and sandbag weights with overhead pulleys · Initially, the team can conduct a group therapy program for exercise based on intervention and counseling education · Institutional-based advertisements will more easily reach those in need, and referrals can be forwarded from many other places
· Referrals happen after worsening symptoms, and there is no medication option · Updating new versions of training devices is an additional cost that prevents institutions from developing PR · Even early-stage patients can be referred for education and advised to perform some physical activities · Institutions can initially start with low-budget equipment on a need basis, with some weight cuffs, pulleys, TheraBands, and medicine balls and some free exercises using only body weight can be initiated · The therapist-to-patient ratios can be 1:4 for exercise training, 1:8 for educational sessions, and 1:1 for complex patients, according to AACVPR guidelines. Alternatively, according to British Thoracic Society guidelines, the ratios can be 1:8 for exercise training (with a minimum of two therapists) and 1:16 for educational sessions. These ratios may vary based on therapist experience and patient volume
· Practitioners and patients are mostly relying on oxygen, nebulizers, steroids, and positive airway pressure

AACVPR, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Table 3.
Socioeconomic barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in India
Barrier to PR
Action to overcome the barrier
Financial barrier Accessibility [42] and transport Adherence with program [46,50] Caregivers’ attention Psychosocial support [51] Financial barrier Accessibility and transport Adherence to program Caregivers’ attention Psychosocial support
· Healthcare institutions should allocate funds for establishing a PR program, including essential equipment for assessment and training. Ongoing expenses will cover personnel salaries in the rehabilitation team, infrastructure maintenance, and equipment upkeep · Most of the PR programs are available in major cities and in district/state headquarter hospitals · Dropout rate is high due to a lack of awareness, no immediate visible symptoms, and boredom with continuing long-term program with less interest · The psychosocial burden on caregivers also plays a role in the lack of adherence to PR · Long-standing disease and medications and repeated hospitalization make patients anxious and depressed · Healthcare institutions seek financial assistance to start PR from established government health schemes or from nongovernmental organizations or research grants from universities and charities · A PR program should be established at the regional level of primary health care center to cover all the needed patients at minimum cost, similar to other diseases · The patients should be motivated to participate in at least one regular visit in a rehabilitation setting and the remaining visits can occur at their home to receive long-term benefits with regular telerehabilitation [50] consisting of either monthly or weekly phone calls to remind them about the exercise program and clarify doubts · Caregivers should be motivated and educated about the benefits and importance of PR to obtain better outcomes · Psychological education [51] and motivation can be initiated through psychiatrists; early referral to psychotherapy and smoking cessation can also be optimal complements
· Patients must afford oxygen and supportive measures and regular rehabilitation program for approximately 6–12 weeks · Patients from rural areas need to travel a longer distance to attend PR · Non-adherence to PR is due to more waiting time for hospital visits and expenses for transport and medical services · Economic burdens, absence from their duties, stress with regular PR attendance, arranging transport, and accompanying people · Lack of family and social support may lead to unwillingness to enroll in PR, feel insecure, and have restricted outdoor mobility · Institutions can add insurance providers for rehabilitation and other support or use insurance programs for long-term patients · Adequate staff should be trained in PR · Establishing multiple referral systems with the PR providers may reduce non-adherence · PR can be arranged as evening sessions for patient convenience or telerehabilitation guidance for their active, voluntary participation · Patients and family members are educated to attend psychological counseling regularly
· Healthcare professionals have limited knowledge about PR and sometimes misguide the patients · Limited improvements in rehabilitation lead to neglecting the program · Repeated infections and exacerbations may prevent participation in PR · Another way to recover funds is by including rehabilitation services in insurance reimbursements · Caregivers should be clearly educated about long-term adherence in PR · Regular outpatient visits and vaccinations will be helpful in reducing exacerbations and infections
· In medical colleges, PR could be added as a free academic service · Caregivers are employees; the healthcare institutions may provide them with a medical certificate or letter to allow reimbursement through their health scheme if applicable
  • 1. World Health Organization (WHO). Noncommunicable diseases [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 2025 Mar 16]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases.
  • 2. India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative Collaborators. Nations within a nation: variations in epidemiological transition across the states of India, 1990-2016 in the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 2017;390:2437–60.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 3. World Health Organization (WHO). Chronic respiratory diseases: burden of COPD [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2024 [cited 2025 Mar 16]. https://www.who.int/respiratory/copd/burden/en/.
  • 4. GBD 2015 Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Respir Med 2017;5:691–706.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 5. Singh Thakur J, Nangia R, Singh S. Progress and challenges in achieving noncommunicable diseases targets for the sustainable development goals. FASEB Bioadv 2021;3:563–8.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 6. Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester C, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:e13–64.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Hui KP, Hewitt AB. A simple pulmonary rehabilitation program improves health outcomes and reduces hospital utilization in patients with COPD. Chest 2003;124:94–7.ArticlePubMed
  • 8. Tonga KO, Oliver BG. Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy: focusing on traditional medical practices. J Clin Med 2023;12:4815.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Spruit MA, Pitta F, Garvey C, ZuWallack RL, Roberts CM, Collins EG, et al. Differences in content and organisational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programmes. Eur Respir J 2014;43:1326–37.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for pulmonary rehabilitation programs. 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2011.
  • 11. Neill R, Shawar YR, Ashraf L, Das P, Champagne SN, Kautsar H, et al. Prioritizing rehabilitation in low- and middle-income country national health systems: a qualitative thematic synthesis and development of a policy framework. Int J Equity Health 2023;22:91.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 12. Corhay JL, Dang DN, Van Cauwenberge H, Louis R. Pulmonary rehabilitation and COPD: providing patients a good environment for optimizing therapy. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2014;9:27–39.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 13. Collins EG, Bauldoff G, Carlin B, Crouch R, Emery CF, Garvey C, et al. Clinical competency guidelines for pulmonary rehabilitation professionals: position statement of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2014;34:291–302.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Baltzan MA, Kamel H, Alter A, Rotaple M, Wolkove N. Pulmonary rehabilitation improves functional capacity in patients 80 years of age or older. Can Respir J 2004;11:407–13.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 15. Berry MJ, Rejeski WJ, Adair NE, Zaccaro D. Exercise rehabilitation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:1248–53.ArticlePubMed
  • 16. Couser JI Jr, Guthmann R, Hamadeh MA, Kane CS. Pulmonary rehabilitation improves exercise capacity in older elderly patients with COPD. Chest 1995;107:730–4.ArticlePubMed
  • 17. Crouch R, Ryan K. Physical therapy and respiratory care: integration as a team in pulmonary rehabilitation. In: Hodgkin JE, Celli BR, Connors GL, editors. Pulmonary rehabilitation: guidelines to success. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 173–211.
  • 18. Crouch R. Physical and respiratory therapy for medical and surgical patient. In: Hodgkin JE, Celli BR, Connors GL, editors. Pulmonary rehabilitation: guidelines to success. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier; 2009. p. 154–79.
  • 19. Rochester CL, Fairburn C, Crouch RH. Pulmonary rehabilitation for respiratory disorders other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 2014;35:369–89.ArticlePubMed
  • 20. O’Donnell DE, McGuire M, Samis L, Webb KA. General exercise training improves ventilatory and peripheral muscle strength and endurance in chronic airflow limitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157(5 Pt 1):1489–97.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Casaburi R, Porszasz J, Burns MR, Carithers ER, Chang RS, Cooper CB. Physiologic benefits of exercise training in rehabilitation of patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1541–51.ArticlePubMed
  • 22. Maltais F, LeBlanc P, Jobin J, Bérubé C, Bruneau J, Carrier L, et al. Intensity of training and physiologic adaptation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:555–61.ArticlePubMed
  • 23. Horowitz MB, Littenberg B, Mahler DA. Dyspnea ratings for prescribing exercise intensity in patients with COPD. Chest 1996;109:1169–75.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Vogiatzis I, Nanas S, Roussos C. Interval training as an alternative modality to continuous exercise in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 2002;20:12–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 25. Puhan MA, Büsching G, Schünemann HJ, VanOort E, Zaugg C, Frey M. Interval versus continuous high-intensity exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:816–25.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 26. Puhan MA, Schünemann HJ, Buesching G, vanOort E, Spaar A, Frey M. COPD patients’ ability to follow exercise influences short-term outcomes of rehabilitation. Eur Respir J 2008;31:304–10.ArticlePubMed
  • 27. Vogiatzis I, Simoes DC, Stratakos G, Kourepini E, Terzis G, Manta P, et al. Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on muscle remodelling in cachectic patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 2010;36:301–10.ArticlePubMed
  • 28. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 2007;116:1081–93.ArticlePubMed
  • 29. Simpson K, Killian K, McCartney N, Stubbing DG, Jones NL. Randomised controlled trial of weightlifting exercise in patients with chronic airflow limitation. Thorax 1992;47:70–5.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 30. Gosselink R, Troosters T, Decramer M. Distribution of muscle weakness in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2000;20:353–60.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Annegarn J, Meijer K, Passos VL, Stute K, Wiechert J, Savelberg HH, et al. Problematic activities of daily life are weakly associated with clinical characteristics in COPD. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012;13:284–90.ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Tattersall R, Walshaw MJ. Posture and cystic fibrosis. J R Soc Med 2003;96(Suppl 43):18–22.PubMed
  • 33. Downs AM. Physical therapy in lung transplantation. Phys Ther 1996;76:626–42.ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Sillen MJ, Speksnijder CM, Eterman RA, Janssen PP, Wagers SS, Wouters EF, et al. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation of muscles of ambulation in patients with chronic heart failure or COPD: a systematic review of the English-language literature. Chest 2009;136:44–61.ArticlePubMed
  • 35. Bourjeily-Habr G, Rochester CL, Palermo F, Snyder P, Mohsenin V. Randomised controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulation of the lower extremities in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 2002;57:1045–9.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 36. Sillen MJ, Wouters EF, Franssen FM, Meijer K, Stakenborg KH, Spruit MA. Oxygen uptake, ventilation, and symptoms during low-frequency versus high-frequency NMES in COPD: a pilot study. Lung 2011;189:21–6.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 37. Neder JA, Sword D, Ward SA, Mackay E, Cochrane LM, Clark CJ. Home based neuromuscular electrical stimulation as a new rehabilitative strategy for severely disabled patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thorax 2002;57:333–7.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 38. Güell R, Resqueti V, Sangenis M, Morante F, Martorell B, Casan P, et al. Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on psychosocial morbidity in patients with severe COPD. Chest 2006;129:899–904.ArticlePubMed
  • 39. de Voogd JN, Wempe JB, Koëter GH, Postema K, van Sonderen E, Ranchor AV, et al. Depressive symptoms as predictors of mortality in patients with COPD. Chest 2009;135:619–25.ArticlePubMed
  • 40. Debigaré R, Marquis K, Côté CH, Tremblay RR, Michaud A, LeBlanc P, et al. Catabolic/anabolic balance and muscle wasting in patients with COPD. Chest 2003;124:83–9.ArticlePubMed
  • 41. Lorig KR, Holman H. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2003;26:1–7.ArticlePubMed
  • 42. Hogg L, Garrod R, Thornton H, McDonnell L, Bellas H, White P. Effectiveness, attendance, and completion of an integrated, system-wide pulmonary rehabilitation service for COPD: prospective observational study. COPD 2012;9:546–54.ArticlePubMed
  • 43. Brooks D, Sottana R, Bell B, Hanna M, Laframboise L, Selvanayagarajah S, et al. Characterization of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in Canada in 2005. Can Respir J 2007;14:87–92.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 44. Johnston K, Grimmer-Somers K. Pulmonary rehabilitation: overwhelming evidence but lost in translation? Physiother Can 2010;62:368–73.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 45. Selzler AM, Simmonds L, Rodgers WM, Wong EY, Stickland MK. Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: predictors of program completion and success. COPD 2012;9:538–45.ArticlePubMed
  • 46. Bansal V, Gaur SN. Challenges of developing a pulmonary rehabilitation programme: practical aspects with India as a model country. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci 2016;58:89–91.ArticlePubMed
  • 47. Thakrar R, Alaparthi GK, Kumar SK, Vaishali K, Zulfeequer CP, Aanad R. Awareness in patients with COPD about the disease and pulmonary rehabilitation: a survey. Lung India 2014;31:134–8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 48. Bairapareddy KC, Chandrasekaran B, Agarwal U. Telerehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: an underrecognized management in tertiary care. Indian J Palliat Care 2018;24:529–33.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 49. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Subcommittee on Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Pulmonary rehabilitation. Thorax 2001;56:827–34.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 50. Beniwal S, Sharma BB, Singh V. What we can say: disease illiteracy. J Assoc Physicians India 2011;59:360–4.PubMed
  • 51. Mahadevan R, Chaya SK, Shankar P, Raj VS. Adherence to exercise training in COPD patients: factors that predict patient adherence and non-adherence: a preliminary study. J Evol Med Dent Sci 2019;8:3427–32.Article

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      Figure
      • 0
      Related articles
      The feasibility of conducting successful pulmonary rehabilitation in India
      Image
      Fig. 1. Components of pulmonary rehabilitation. BODE, body mass Index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity; CRQ, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; SF-36, Short Form-36 Health Survey; VO2, volume of oxygen consumption; ABG, arterial blood gas analysis; BMI, body mass index.
      The feasibility of conducting successful pulmonary rehabilitation in India
      Barrier to PR
      Factor to overcome the barrier
      Professional [47] Patient [48] Professional Patient [45]
      · Medical and allied professionals lack awareness and low acceptance of the beneficial effects of PR · Lack of awareness among patients about rehabilitation, as they mostly rely on medications for symptomatic relief · Incorporate PR into the undergraduate and post-graduate programs for medical, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, and nursing fields · Motivation is essential for a successful rehabilitation program
      · They are not adequately exposed to related concepts and benefits during undergraduate and post-graduate education, or later in clinical practice. This lack of knowledge often delays referring patients to rehabilitation services · They are referred to a rehabilitation program at an advanced stage of disease when symptoms are severe and activities of daily living impaired. Under such circumstances, patients are exhausted, depressed, and ignore rehabilitation · Adequate training in the PR unit to see all types of patients, their adherence to the program, and beneficial outcomes · Patients and caregivers should receive regular education about the program and its positive results
      · The focus is primarily on establishing regular outpatient clinics, emergency departments, and intensive care units, leading to delays in hiring staff explicitly trained for PR assessments. Additionally, there is a lack of research reports on PR and its outcomes · At least they must include a minimal exercise-based intervention along with their regular medications to promote regular activities of daily living · If financial constraints are the main issue, telerehabilitation and at-home activities should be implemented [50]
      · Full-fledged center with adequate equipment is essential [49] · It should be highlighted that rehabilitation is more cost-effective than standard services
      · Physiotherapy curriculum should be enriched with specific training for a minimum of 3–6 months [45]
      · Conducting and publishing research related to PR will create more positive advances towards appropriate referrals
      Barrier to PR
      Factor to overcome the barrier
      Referral Oxygen and instrument availability Staffing Advertisement Referral Oxygen and instrument availability Staffing Advertisement
      · Medication is preferred for symptomatic relief; wrong diagnosis leads to a delay in referral · Patients frequently lack the willingness or ability to afford the costs associated with home oxygen, equipment, or attending rehabilitative sessions · A multidisciplinary team is essential when setting up the PR program with regular practice · Lack of advertising about PR on social media · Referral should be initiated with proper diagnosis and its potential outcomes with rehabilitation program · Patients can be advised to purchase an oxygen concentrator for long-term use at an affordable cost · The multidisciplinary PR team enables collaboration and includes driven professionals from various fields with specialized knowledge in chronic respiratory care. The team can start with a smaller number of members and expand as they become proficient in providing the necessary elements of PR · Positive impact of rehabilitation program can be published through social media and internet
      · Patients are referred after finding difficulties with their regular routine · Healthcare institutions must spend more money on purchasing equipment required for rehabilitation, infrastructure maintenance, and instrumentation · Recruiting, training, and maintaining staff adequately is crucial; this could become difficult to manage · Many institutions and hospitals also do not display or advertise the program · Even with respiratory failure, patients can be referred with precaution to PR under strict supervision and medical monitoring · PR can involve home-based exercise using ordinary objects such as bicycles, water bottles, and sandbag weights with overhead pulleys · Initially, the team can conduct a group therapy program for exercise based on intervention and counseling education · Institutional-based advertisements will more easily reach those in need, and referrals can be forwarded from many other places
      · Referrals happen after worsening symptoms, and there is no medication option · Updating new versions of training devices is an additional cost that prevents institutions from developing PR · Even early-stage patients can be referred for education and advised to perform some physical activities · Institutions can initially start with low-budget equipment on a need basis, with some weight cuffs, pulleys, TheraBands, and medicine balls and some free exercises using only body weight can be initiated · The therapist-to-patient ratios can be 1:4 for exercise training, 1:8 for educational sessions, and 1:1 for complex patients, according to AACVPR guidelines. Alternatively, according to British Thoracic Society guidelines, the ratios can be 1:8 for exercise training (with a minimum of two therapists) and 1:16 for educational sessions. These ratios may vary based on therapist experience and patient volume
      · Practitioners and patients are mostly relying on oxygen, nebulizers, steroids, and positive airway pressure
      Barrier to PR
      Action to overcome the barrier
      Financial barrier Accessibility [42] and transport Adherence with program [46,50] Caregivers’ attention Psychosocial support [51] Financial barrier Accessibility and transport Adherence to program Caregivers’ attention Psychosocial support
      · Healthcare institutions should allocate funds for establishing a PR program, including essential equipment for assessment and training. Ongoing expenses will cover personnel salaries in the rehabilitation team, infrastructure maintenance, and equipment upkeep · Most of the PR programs are available in major cities and in district/state headquarter hospitals · Dropout rate is high due to a lack of awareness, no immediate visible symptoms, and boredom with continuing long-term program with less interest · The psychosocial burden on caregivers also plays a role in the lack of adherence to PR · Long-standing disease and medications and repeated hospitalization make patients anxious and depressed · Healthcare institutions seek financial assistance to start PR from established government health schemes or from nongovernmental organizations or research grants from universities and charities · A PR program should be established at the regional level of primary health care center to cover all the needed patients at minimum cost, similar to other diseases · The patients should be motivated to participate in at least one regular visit in a rehabilitation setting and the remaining visits can occur at their home to receive long-term benefits with regular telerehabilitation [50] consisting of either monthly or weekly phone calls to remind them about the exercise program and clarify doubts · Caregivers should be motivated and educated about the benefits and importance of PR to obtain better outcomes · Psychological education [51] and motivation can be initiated through psychiatrists; early referral to psychotherapy and smoking cessation can also be optimal complements
      · Patients must afford oxygen and supportive measures and regular rehabilitation program for approximately 6–12 weeks · Patients from rural areas need to travel a longer distance to attend PR · Non-adherence to PR is due to more waiting time for hospital visits and expenses for transport and medical services · Economic burdens, absence from their duties, stress with regular PR attendance, arranging transport, and accompanying people · Lack of family and social support may lead to unwillingness to enroll in PR, feel insecure, and have restricted outdoor mobility · Institutions can add insurance providers for rehabilitation and other support or use insurance programs for long-term patients · Adequate staff should be trained in PR · Establishing multiple referral systems with the PR providers may reduce non-adherence · PR can be arranged as evening sessions for patient convenience or telerehabilitation guidance for their active, voluntary participation · Patients and family members are educated to attend psychological counseling regularly
      · Healthcare professionals have limited knowledge about PR and sometimes misguide the patients · Limited improvements in rehabilitation lead to neglecting the program · Repeated infections and exacerbations may prevent participation in PR · Another way to recover funds is by including rehabilitation services in insurance reimbursements · Caregivers should be clearly educated about long-term adherence in PR · Regular outpatient visits and vaccinations will be helpful in reducing exacerbations and infections
      · In medical colleges, PR could be added as a free academic service · Caregivers are employees; the healthcare institutions may provide them with a medical certificate or letter to allow reimbursement through their health scheme if applicable
      Table 1. Awareness barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in India

      Table 2. Practical barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in India

      AACVPR, American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

      Table 3. Socioeconomic barriers to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in India


      JYMS : Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
      TOP