
, Bu-Lang Gao2,*
, Jihong Hu1
, Wei Zhao1
, Yang Tian1
, Liqing Yao3
, Yongneng Jiang1
1Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
2Department of Medical Research, Shijiazhuang People’s Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
© 2025 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Yeungnam University Institute of Medical Science
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Conflicts of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Funding
None.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, and Validation: all authors; Data curation, Methodology, Software, and Supervision: RY, JH, WZ, YT, LY, YJ; Project administration: JH, LY; Resources: WZ, YT, LY, YJ; Visualization: RY, BLG, JH, WZ, YT, LY; Writing-original draft: RY; Writing-review & editing: all authors.
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
FF, fat fraction; CSA, cross-sectional area; SRS, stroke-related sarcopenia.
Height 1 of lip 1 peak represented the highest intracellular fat content while area 1 under the lip 1 peak stood for the intracellular fat concentration. Height 2 and area 2 of lip 2 stood for the highest value of extracellular fat content and the concentration of extracellular fat, respectively.
FF, fat fraction; 1H-MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Height 1 of the lip 1 peak represented the highest intracellular fat content while area 1 under the lip 1 peak stood for the intracellular fat concentration. Height 2 and area 2 of the lip 2 peak stood for the highest value of extracellular fat content and the concentration of extracellular fat, respectively.
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
SRS, stroke-related sarcopenia.
Height 1 of lip 1 peak represented the highest intracellular fat content while area 1 under the lip 1 peak stood for the intracellular fat concentration. Height 2 and area 2 of lip 2 stood for the highest value of extracellular fat content and the concentration of extracellular fat, respectively.
| Characteristic | Total | SRS | Non-SRS | Control | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 120 (100) | 40 (33.3) | 40 (33.3) | 40 (33.3) | - |
| Male sex | 115 (95.8) | 38 (95.0) | 39 (97.5) | 38 (95.0) | 0.710 |
| Age (yr) | 40.5±5.8 | 46.2±7.1 | 42.6±6.5 | 39.3±8.2 | 0.203 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.9±3.8 | 21.6±4.6 | 24.0±2.3 | 20.3±5.0 | 0.313 |
| Disease course (day) | 50 (19.8–110.0) | 53 (28.0–110.0) | 49 (19.8–99.3) | 0 (0) | 0.241 |
| Patients with cerebral infarction | 43(35.8) | 22 (55.0) | 21 (52.5) | 0 (0) | 0.330 |
| Patients with cerebral hemorrhage | 37 (30.8) | 18 (45.0) | 19 (47.5) | 0 (0) | 0.402 |
| Left paralysis | 62 (51.7) | 33 (82.5) | 29 (72.5) | 0 (0) | 0.101 |
| MMSE score | 27.3±6.1 | 27.8±3.5 | 26.9±5.8 | 30.0±3.5 | 0.131 |
| Variable | Control | Non-SRS | SRS | F | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rectus femoris muscle | 1.40±0.43 | 1.70±0.71 | 7.73±1.32 | 6.620 | 0.002 |
| Lateral thigh muscle | 2.51±0.82 | 4.51±0.90 | 8.20±1.81 | 3.713 | 0.029 |
| Medius femoris muscle | 3.14±0.90 | 3.74±0.83 | 6.02±1.43 | 3.741 | 0.047 |
| Medial thigh muscle | 2.70±0.83 | 4.70±0.91 | 6.84±2.20 | 4.632 | 0.031 |
| Biceps femoris muscle | 1.42±0.90 | 7.90±0.92 | 11.72±1.70 | 4.420 | 0.014 |
| Semitendinosus muscle | 2.91±0.50 | 8.32±0.90 | 11.64±1.80 | 4.811 | 0.011 |
| Semimembranosus muscle | 3.20±0.91 | 7.91±0.82 | 12.04±1.81 | 5.603 | 0.026 |
| Gracilis muscle | 3.32±0.64 | 6.90±1.10 | 9.63±1.90 | 5.041 | 0.009 |
| Adductor magnus muscle | 1.70±0.71 | 7.93±1.24 | 8.80±1.62 | 7.200 | 0.001 |
| Sartorius muscle | 3.60±0.82 | 7.54±1.40 | 9.80±1.82 | 2.303 | 0.020 |
| Adductor longus muscle | 3.41±2.10 | 6.93±0.92 | 8.71±1.70 | 4.742 | 0.030 |
| Variable | Group | Mean difference | Standard error | 95% CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Rectus femoris muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 1.923 | 0.004 | 0.013–0.034 | 0.053 |
| Control vs. SRS | 2.420 | 0.003 | 0.012–0.041 | 0.002 | |
| 1. Lateral thigh muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.002 | 0.023 | 0.034–0.012 | 0.316 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.031 | 0.031 | 0.010–0.023 | 0.045 | |
| 1. Muscle of the middle thigh | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.021 | 0.040 | 0.022–0.030 | 0.669 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.034 | 0.021 | 0.031–0.042 | 0.048 | |
| 1. Medial thigh muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.032 | 0.042 | 0.014–0.053 | 0.520 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.042 | 0.012 | 0.124–0.032 | 0.041 | |
| 1. Biceps femoris muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 4.403 | 0.003 | 0.081–0.092 | 0.290 |
| Control vs. SRS | 6.231 | 0.031 | 0.104–0.203 | 0.004 | |
| 1. Semitendinosus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 5.814 | 0.023 | 0.011–0.024 | 0.300 |
| Control vs. SRS | 4.722 | 0.004 | 0.082–0.093 | 0.021 | |
| 1. Semimembranosus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.031 | 0.003 | 0.103–0.052 | 0.671 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.004 | 0.021 | 0.142–0.043 | 0.030 | |
| 1. Gracilis muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.130 | 0.012 | 0.114–0.021 | 0.220 |
| Control vs. SRS | 8.202 | 0.032 | 0.130–0.032 | 0.002 | |
| 1. Adductor magnus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 4.032 | 0.034 | 0.013–0.021 | 0.400 |
| Control vs. SRS | 5.343 | 0.023 | 0.014–0.020 | <0.001 | |
| 1. Sartorius muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.040– 0.053 | 0.863 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.013 | 0.043 | 0.062–0.094 | 0.030 | |
| 1. Adductor longus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.032 | 0.024 | 0.063–0.082 | 0.159 |
| Control vs. SRS | 4.542 | 0.001 | 0.081–0.092 | 0.021 | |
| 1. Bone marrow cavity | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.131 | 0.004 | 0.023–0.111 | 0.057 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.124 | 0.023 | 0.012–0.101 | 0.095 | |
| 2. Rectus femoris muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.004 | 0.031 | 0.004–0.023 | 0.553 |
| Control vs. SRS | 4.732 | 0.011 | 0.081–0.124 | 0.009 | |
| 2. Lateral thigh muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 2.604 | 0.011 | 0.050– 0.061 | 0.033 |
| Control vs. SRS | 5.601 | 0.010 | 0.082–0.094 | <0.001 | |
| 2. Medius femoris muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.013 | 0.012 | 0.023– 0.082 | 0.378 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.024–0.043 | 0.040 | |
| 2. Medial thigh muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.020 | 0.010 | 0.051–0.074 | 0.109 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.031 | 0.013 | 0.052–0.093 | 0.047 | |
| 2. Biceps femoris muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.022 | 0.010 | 0.050–0.062 | 0.130 |
| Control vs. SRS | 4.003 | 0.021 | 0.071–0.084 | 0.008 | |
| 2. Semitendinosus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.001 | 0.013 | 0.031–0.093 | 0.948 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.011 | 0.024 | 0.042–0.070 | 0.019 | |
| 2. Semimembranosus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.023 | 0.012 | 0.050–0.064 | 0.127 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.052 | 0.020 | 0.072– 0.093 | 0.003 | |
| 2. Gracilis muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.003 | 0.023 | 0.031–0.090 | 0.891 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.014 | 0.022 | 0.042–0.081 | 0.031 | |
| 2. Adductor magnus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.040 | 0.024 | 0.053– 0.080 | 0.055 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.032 | 0.021 | 0.062–0.083 | 0.030 | |
| 2. Sartorius muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.013 | 0.020 | 0.040–0.074 | 0.708 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.014 | 0.011 | 0.042–0.062 | 0.040 | |
| 2. Adductor longus muscle | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.030 | 0.010 | 0.051–0.072 | 0.064 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.023 | 0.013 | 0.050–0.081 | 0.049 | |
| 2. Bone marrow cavity | Control vs. non-SRS | 0.052 | 0.042 | 0.020–0.124 | 0.196 |
| Control vs. SRS | 0.051 | 0.040 | 0.021–0.133 | 0.185 |
| Variable | Control | Non-SRS | SRS | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF values | ||||
| Anterior lateral muscle group | 3.52±0.63 | 3.91±0.82 | 5.84±0.73 | 0.002 |
| Posterior muscle group | 6.61±1.02 | 15.23±3.50 | 20.60±3.63 | 0.006 |
| Adductor muscle group | 5.23±0.80 | 6.72±0.94 | 8.92±1.00 | 0.009 |
| Muscle CSA | ||||
| Anterior lateral muscle | 5,200.3±921.6 | 4,592.4±638.8 | 2,395.6±352.6 | <0.001 |
| Posterior muscle | 1,921.6±329.7 | 1,500.3±276.4 | 598.5±105.7 | <0.001 |
| Adductor muscle | 2,863.6±547.8 | 2,443.8±396.4 | 1,906.9±361.8 | 0.041 |
| Fat CSA | ||||
| Intermuscular and subcutaneous | 1,886.2±239.4 | 2,400.5±106.2 | 3,015.8±205.1 | <0.001 |
| Variable | FF |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intermediate thigh muscle | Medial thigh muscle | Biceps femoris muscle | Adductor magnus muscle | Sartorius muscle | Adductor longus muscle | |
| Height 2 | 0.053 | 0.402 | 0.094 | 0.281 | 0.070 | 0.253 |
| Area 2 | 0.041 | 0.471 | 0.193 | 0.432 | 0.174 | 0.352 |
| Height 1 | 0.452 | 0.334 | 0.501 | 0.253 | 0.102 | 0.290 |
| Area 1 | 0.460 | 0.380 | 0.172 | 0.461 | 0.493 | 0.341 |
| Variable | Normal | Non-SRS | SRS | F | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Height 2 | 1.80±0.11 | 5.52±0.30 | 6.90±0.72 | 1.702 | 0.041 |
| Area 2 | 1.14±0.03 | 2.10±0.11 | 3.13±0.12 | 1.141 | 0.030 |
| Height 1 | 5.62±0.30 | 5.03±0.40 | 7.52±0.83 | 1.631 | 0.022 |
| Area 1 | 0.10±0.02 | 0.54±0.03 | 1.24±0.21 | 2.201 | 0.013 |
Values are presented as number (%) or mean±standard deviation. SRS, stroke-related sarcopenia; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. FF, fat fraction; SRS, stroke-related sarcopenia.
FF, fat fraction; SRS, stroke-related sarcopenia; CI, confidence interval; 1, muscles on the disease side; 2, muscles on the normal side.
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. FF, fat fraction; CSA, cross-sectional area; SRS, stroke-related sarcopenia. Height 1 of lip 1 peak represented the highest intracellular fat content while area 1 under the lip 1 peak stood for the intracellular fat concentration. Height 2 and area 2 of lip 2 stood for the highest value of extracellular fat content and the concentration of extracellular fat, respectively.
FF, fat fraction; 1H-MRS, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Height 1 of the lip 1 peak represented the highest intracellular fat content while area 1 under the lip 1 peak stood for the intracellular fat concentration. Height 2 and area 2 of the lip 2 peak stood for the highest value of extracellular fat content and the concentration of extracellular fat, respectively.
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation. SRS, stroke-related sarcopenia. Height 1 of lip 1 peak represented the highest intracellular fat content while area 1 under the lip 1 peak stood for the intracellular fat concentration. Height 2 and area 2 of lip 2 stood for the highest value of extracellular fat content and the concentration of extracellular fat, respectively.