The demand for drug-induced sedation for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans have substantially increased in response to increases in MRI utilization and growing interest in anxiety in children. Understanding the pharmacologic options for deep sedation and general anesthesia in an MRI environment is essential to achieve immobility for the successful completion of the procedure and ensure rapid and safe discharge of children undergoing ambulatory MRI. For painless diagnostic MRI, a single sedative/anesthetic agent without analgesia is safer than a combination of multiple sedatives. The traditional drugs, such as chloral hydrate, pentobarbital, midazolam, and ketamine, are still used due to the ease of administration despite low sedation success rate, prolonged recovery, and significant adverse events. Currently, dexmedetomidine, with respiratory drive preservation, and propofol, with high effectiveness and rapid recovery, are preferred for children undergoing ambulatory MRI. General anesthesia using propofol or sevoflurane can also provide predictable rapid time to readiness and scan times in infant or children with comorbidities. The selection of appropriate drugs as well as sufficient monitoring equipment are vital for effective and safe sedation and anesthesia for ambulatory pediatric MRI.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Prioritisation of data-poor pharmaceuticals for empirical testing and environmental risk assessment Cristiana Cannata, Thomas Backhaus, Irene Bramke, Maria Caraman, Anna Lombardo, Rhys Whomsley, Caroline T.A. Moermond, Ad M.J. Ragas Environment International.2024; 183: 108379. CrossRef
Review of pediatric sedation and anesthesia for radiological diagnostic and therapeutic procedures Mohammed Ageel Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences.2024; 17(1): 100833. CrossRef
Comparison of airway collapsibility following single induction dose ketamine with propofol versus propofol sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A randomised controlled study Pooja Bhardwaj, Sakthirajan Panneerselvam, Priya Rudingwa, Kirthiha Govindaraj, M.V.S. Satya Prakash, Ashok S. Badhe, Krishnan Nagarajan Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.2024; 68(2): 189. CrossRef
Evaluating Sedation Strategies for Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Comprehensive Review of Intravenous Fentanyl, Butorphanol, and Midazolam in Adult and Pediatric Populations Neeta Verma, Janhavi S Dahake Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of Dexmedetomidine Compared to Other Needle-Free Pharmacological Sedation Methods in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Imaging Procedures Mohammed Alsabri Hussein Alsabri, Abdelrahman Abdelshafi, Ahmed Bostamy Elsnhory, Noha S. amir Ahmed, Alaa Bostamy Elsnhory, Douaa Albelal, Fatima Ikram Pediatric Emergency Care.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Adverse events and sedation characteristics of propofol and dexmedetomidine during magnetic resonance imaging: An observational study in neuropsychiatric population Shyamala Narayanan, Sriganesh Kamath, Dhritiman Chakrabarti Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice.2024; 0: 1. CrossRef
Comparison of oral triclofos and intranasal midazolam and dexmedetomidine for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): an open-label, three-arm, randomized trial Shyam Chandrasekar, Bhagirathi Dwibedi, Rashmi Ranjan Das, Biswa Mohan Padhy, Bikram Kishore Behera European Journal of Pediatrics.2023; 182(3): 1385. CrossRef
Correlation between the actual sleep time 24 hours prior to an examination and the time to achieve chloral hydrate sedation in pediatric patients in South Korea: a prospective cohort study Mijung Park, Ji Um, So Hyun Kim, Jiseon Yoon, Yeonjae Lee, Jiyeong Kwon, Seonhee Baek, Dong Yeon Kim Child Health Nursing Research.2023; 29(1): 51. CrossRef
COMPARISON OF INTRAMUSCULAR VERSUS INTRAVENOUS KETAMINE FOR SEDATION IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING EXAMINATION Jasim M. Salman, Jasim N. Al-Asadi, Husham H. Abdul-Ra’aoof, Jawad H. Ahmed, Ali H Reshak Wiadomości Lekarskie.2023; 76(1): 198. CrossRef
Does sevoflurane sedation in pediatric patients lead to “pseudo” leptomeningeal enhancement in the brain on 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging? Kiran Hilal, Kumail Khandwala, Saima Rashid, Faheemullah Khan, Shayan Sirat Maheen Anwar World Journal of Radiology.2023; 15(4): 127. CrossRef
Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal midazolam as sole sedative agents for pelviabdominal magnetic resonance imaging in pediatrics: A randomized double-blind trial TaysserM Abdelraheem, HamdyA Hendawy, AmiraM Elkeblawy Bali Journal of Anesthesiology.2023; 7(2): 99. CrossRef
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine to oral midazolam as premedication for propofol sedation in pediatric patients undergoing magnet Olivia Nzungu Wabelo, Denis Schmartz, Mario Giancursio, Françoise De Pooter, Giulia Caruso, Jean-François Fils, Philippe Van der Linden Trials.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The effect of age on outpatient pediatric procedural sedation with intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam Xiaqing Zhou, Jialian Zhao, Haiya Tu, Kunwei Chen, Yaoqin Hu, Yue Jin European Journal of Pediatrics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Determination of the normal conus medullaris level in term infants: the role of MRI in early infancy Mengchun Sun, Benzhang Tao, Gan Gao, Hui Wang, Aijia Shang Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics.2022; 29(1): 100. CrossRef
Patient background related to success and adverse event in pediatric sedated MRI Yutaka Konda, Hajime Mihira, Louis Akiyama, Yuki Shiko, Yoshihito Ozawa, Yohei Kawasaki, Katsunori Fujii, Ryugo Hiramoto Pediatrics International.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of Risk Factors for Chloral Hydrate Sedative Failure with Initial Dose in Pediatric Patients: a Retrospective Analysis Yu Cui, Langtao Guo, Qixia Mu, Lu Kang, Qin Chen, Qunying Wu, Yani He, Min Tang Pediatric Drugs.2022; 24(4): 403. CrossRef
Using intranasal dexmedetomidine with buccal midazolam for magnetic resonance imaging sedation in children: A single-arm prospective interventional study Bi Lian Li, Hao Luo, Jun Xiang Huang, Huan Huan Zhang, Joanna R. Paquin, Vivian M. Yuen, Xing Rong Song Frontiers in Pediatrics.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A Novel Propofol Dosing Regimen for Pediatric Sedation during Radiologic Tests Ji-Young Min, Jeong-Rim Lee, Hye-Mi Lee, Ho-Jae Nam, Hyo-Jin Byon Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(17): 5076. CrossRef
Psychiatric outcomes following ketamine administration for orthopedic surgical anesthesia Alec E. Mansour, Elijah W. Hale, Daniel S. Saks Frontiers in Anesthesiology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Artificial intelligence in paediatric radiology: Future opportunities Natasha Davendralingam, Neil J Sebire, Owen J Arthurs, Susan C Shelmerdine The British Journal of Radiology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Background The type and regimen of anesthesia may affect perioperative hyperglycemia following major surgical stress. This study compared the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the incidence of hyperglycemia and clinical outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing lung surgery.
Methods This retrospective study included 176 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who had undergone lung surgery. Blood glucose levels and clinical outcomes from the preoperative period to the first 2 postoperative days (PODs) were retrospectively examined in patients who received sevoflurane (group S, n= 87) and propofol (group P, n=89) for maintenance of general anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the incidence of persistent hyperglycemia (2 consecutive blood glucose levels >180 mg/dL [10.0 mmol/L]) during the perioperative period. The secondary composite endpoint was the incidence of major postoperative complications and 30-day mortality rate after surgery.
Results Blood glucose levels similarly increased from the preoperative period to the second POD in both groups (p=0.857). Although blood glucose levels at 2 hours after surgery were significantly lower in group P than in group S (p=0.022; 95% confidence interval for mean difference, -27.154 to -2.090), there was no difference in the incidence of persistent hyperglycemia during the perioperative period (group S, 70%; group P, 69%; p=0.816). The composite of major postoperative complications and all-cause in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were also comparable between the two groups.
Conclusion Sevoflurane and propofol were associated with a comparable incidence of perioperative hyperglycemia and clinical outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing lung surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Strategies for intraoperative glucose management: a scoping review Nathaniel Morin, Sarah Taylor, Danae Krahn, Leyla Baghirzada, Michael Chong, Tyrone G. Harrison, Anne Cameron, Shannon M. Ruzycki Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.2023; 70(2): 253. CrossRef
Impact of total intravenous anesthesia and total inhalation anesthesia as the anesthesia maintenance approaches on blood glucose level and postoperative complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial Xinghui Xiong, Yong He, Cheng Zhou, Qin Zheng, Chan Chen, Peng Liang BMC Anesthesiology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Current trends in management of hyperglycaemia in surgical patients with diabetes mellitus: a review Vladimir N. Kuklin, J. Matri, N. P. Barlow, S. H. Tveit, J. E. Kvernberg, E. -M. Ringvold, V. Dahl Annals of Critical Care.2022; (4): 33. CrossRef
Effects of sevoflurane anesthesia and abdominal surgery on the systemic metabolome: a prospective observational study Yiyong Wei, Donghang Zhang, Jin Liu, Mengchan Ou, Peng Liang, Yunxia Zuo, Cheng Zhou BMC Anesthesiology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef