INTRODUCTION

Development of one-lung ventilation (OLV) in anesthesiology has greatly influenced the development of lung surgery. During OLV, respiration is achieved only with a dependent lung, and the anesthesiologist must prevent hypoxemia due to increased shunting, as well as lung injury due to increased airway pressure, in contrast with two-lung ventilation [1-4]. According to previous studies comparing oxygenation rates between different ventilator modes during OLV, improvement in oxygenation in volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) showed moderate differences in accordance with pulmonary function. Patients who were expected to have decreased pulmonary function based on preoperative pulmonary function tests showed better oxygenation with PCV, compared to that with VCV[5]. In patients with normal pulmonary function, there was no difference between VCV and PCV[6]. In studies comparing VCV with pressure-controlled ventilation-volume-guaranteed (PCV-VG), PCV-VG showed better oxygenation during OLV[7,8].

In order to prevent lung injury during OLV, a protective ventilation strategy has been widely used, i.e., by lowering tidal volume and applying positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), which reduces lung injury while maintaining oxygenation [1,2,9].

The primary goal of this study was to investigate whether a decrease in tidal volume of 6mL/kg with or without 5 cmH₂O PEEP would be enough to prevent lung barotrauma by reducing inspiratory airway pressure, while maintaining appropriate oxygenation during OLV using PCV-VG, which has the merits of PCV and the tidal volume-designating characteristic of VCV.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study proceeded with approval from the institutional review board of our hospital. The study enrolled 27 subjects who were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 or 2 and scheduled for pulmonary surgery under OLV (Table 1). All subjects provided written informed consent before surgery. Patients scheduled for pneumonectomy were excluded. All patients received pulmonary function tests preoperatively. Subjects with forced vital capacity (FVC) lower than 70% of predicted value or those with forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1) lower than 70% of predicted value were excluded. Patients with previous lung surgery or heart disease were also excluded.

All subjects were given an intramuscular injection of glycopyrrolate 0.2mg before entering the operating room as premedication. In the operating room, the electrocardiogram, pulse oximeter, non-invasive blood pressure, and bispectral index were monitored. Anesthesia was induced with 4 μg/mL of propofol and 4 ng/mL of remifentanil, using target controlled infusion (TCI). For intubation, 100% oxygen was administrated via mask. After loss of consciousness, 1mg/kg rocuronium was injected for muscle relaxation. After checking muscle relaxation, patients were intubated with a left-side double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT, Silbroncho^®, Fuji System Corp, Tokyo, Japan). The position of the DLT was checked by auscultation, followed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) for confirmation. After these procedures, a 20-G catheter was installed for perioperative blood pressure monitoring and blood collection for arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA). A central venous catheter was inserted in the subclavian vein, on the ipsilateral side of the operation site. Anesthesia maintenance was achieved using 6 L/min 100% oxygen, propofol, and remifentanil TCI. One hour after induction, vecuronium 0.08 mg/kg/h was additionally injected for muscle relaxation.

The location of the DLT was examined again with FOB after the patient was placed in lateral decubitus position. All patients underwent surgery using the same anesthetic equipment (Avance, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI, USA), using PCV-VG as ventilation mode. After induction, tidal volumes were 8-10mL/kg during two-lung ventilation. During OLV, patients were initially placed on TV 8mL/kg (group TV8) without PEEP. Ventilation was subsequently changed to TV 6 mL/kg with PEEP (5 cmH₂O; group TV6+PEEP) or without (group TV6), in random sequence. Peak airway pressure (P_peak), mean airway pressure (P_mean), exhaled tidal volume (TVE), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), end-tidal CO₂ (ETCO₂), and ABGA were measured and examined just before OLV and 30 min after each mode of OLV was applied. Ventilation was changed once more to add or eliminate PEEP (5 cmH₂O), while maintaining TV 6mL/kg. Thirty min after changing ventilator settings, the same parameters were measured once more (Fig. 1). PCV-VG mode was used under 40 cmH₂O of maximum airway pressure (Pmax), I:E ratio of 1:2, and the minimal time to reach target airway pressure was set as 5 s. Respiratory rates during anesthesia were set equally for all patients at 12 times per min. When SpO₂ levels were below 90%, or when arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO₂) was below 80mmHg in ABGA, subjects were discontinued from this study and hypoxia was corrected by tidal volume elevation, relocation of DLT, or two-lung ventilation, if needed.

Sample size was calculated as 24, with 80% power and 0.05 statistical significance, using the average and standard deviation of established values [5,9], according to all three ventilation methods. Assuming a 10% drop-out rate, 27 subjects were included in the study. Each mode of ventilation was statistically assessed using SPSS for Windows, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and repeated measures analysis of variance. All measured values were presented as averages and standard deviations, and p-values <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

RESULTS

Of the 27 patients, three dropped out and the study was conducted statistically on the remaining 24 subjects. In these three patients, arterial oxygen partial pressure after 30 min of respiration with tidal volume of 6mL/kg on ABGA was 60.8, 70.2, and 71.8mmHg, respectively. Although the peripheral oxygen saturation did not fall below 90%, tidal volume was increased after interrupting the study.

Among 24 patients, 16 (males, n=16/18) had a past smoking history and two (n=2/16) had both smoking and tuberculosis histories. No female patients (n=6) had a history of smoking or tuberculosis (Table 1).

The P_peak values were significantly higher in the TV8 group (21.8±3.1 cmH₂O) compared to the TV6 (19.3±3.3 cmH₂O) and TV6+PEEP (20.1±3.4 cmH₂O) groups (p<0.002). The P_mean values were significantly higher in the TV6+PEEP group (10.7±1.4 cmH₂O) compared to those in the other groups (p=0.000). The TVE values were significantly higher in the TV8 group (464.2±93.0mL), but there was no statistically significant difference between TV6 (363.2±69.3mL) and TV6+PEEP (359.6±74.7mL). The ETCO₂ values were significantly lower in the TV8 group (30.6±4.2mmHg) compared to those in the other groups (p=0.003), but there were no significant differences between TV6 (32.8±4.8mmHg) and TV6+PEEP (33.1±4.7mmHg) (p>0.05) (Table 2).

The arterial oxygen partial pressure was significantly higher in TV8 group (242.5±111.4mmHg) than in TV6 group (202.1±101.3mmHg) (p=0.044). There was no significant difference between TV8 and TV6+PEEP groups (226.8±121.1 mmHg) (p>0.05). The arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure was significantly higher in both TV6 (42.6±6.8mmHg) and TV6+PEEP (43.4±7.5mmHg) groups compared to that in the TV8 (39.3±5.7mmHg) group (p=0.003, 0.002) (Table 3).

There was no difference in arterial oxygen saturation, hematocrit levels, and hemodynamic variables among the three groups (p>0.05) (Table 3, 4).

DISCUSSION

During OLV with PCV-VG, a tidal volume of 8mL/kg and a tidal volume of 6mL/kg with PEEP of 5 cmH₂O could safely be applied for appropriate oxygenation. Tidal volume of 6 mL/kg without PEEP showed the lowest maximum and average inspiratory pressure. However, about 11% of our subjects (3/27) showed hypoxemia with arterial oxygen partial pressures under 80mmHg at a tidal volume of 6mL/kg without PEEP. Therefore, the authors believe that single application of tidal volume 6mL/kg with PCV-VG without PEEP creates a high risk of intraoperative hypoxemia.

PCV-VG is the latest addition to respiration methods used in anesthetic machines; it calculates the patient’s lung compliance by initial respiration with VCV mode, followed by programmed control of tidal volumes, which are previously set [10]. Song et al. [11] reported that using PCV-VG mode increased expiratory volume compared to that using VCV mode.

In PCV mode, the tidal volume can change depending on lung compliance, leading to hypercarbia caused by decreased minute volumes. In PCV-VG mode, when compared to VCV mode, expiratory volume is increased and can be maintained, keeping the minute volume at appropriate levels. Theoretically, PCV-VG can lower airway pressure during inspiration, thus improving oxygenation by matching the V/Q ratio of the dependent lung. Bouls and Ghobrial [7] previously reported that using tidal volumes of 8-10mL/kg can improve oxygenation during OLV in PCV-VG mode, compared to that in VCV mode. Moreover, Pu et al. [8] reported that using tidal volumes of 8-10 mL/kg can improve oxygenation during OLV in PCV-VG mode. However, Song et al. [11] reported that tidal volume of 8mL/kg reduces peak airway pressure, but does not lead to statistically significant differences in arterial oxygen partial pressure between PCV-VG and VCV. According to previous studies, application of PCV-VG in anesthesiology is desirable. Therefore, the authors investigated the optimal tidal volume for use of PCV-VG mode, which can successfully lower the airway pressure while also improving oxygenation.

In OLV using VCV mode, a minimum tidal volume of 8mL/kg maintains oxygenation while not causing atelectasis [12]. Moreover, tidal volume of 9mL/kg or lower has not been reported to cause lung injury [13]. Kim et al. [14] reported that the probability of hypoxemia is 70% when tidal volume of 6mL/kg is used during OLV with VCV mode and 65% when 5 cmH₂O of PEEP is added to tidal volume of 6mL/kg. These data show a much higher hypoxemia incidence compared with 5% hypoxemia incidence when tidal volume 10mL/kg was used for OLV with VCV. In addition, at tidal volume of 10mL/kg, there were no cases showing expansion pressure of up to 37 cmH₂O, leading to the conclusion that there was no pulmonary damage. Therefore, in patients with normal lung function, high tidal volume such as 10mL/kg increases the arterial oxygen partial pressure, and OLV does not cause complications such as lung injury. In the present study, using tidal volume of 6mL/kg in PCV-VG mode caused hypoxemia in 11% of patients. Hypoxemia did not occur when using tidal volume of 8mL/kg or 6mL/kg with 5 cmH₂O of PEEP in PCV-VG mode, thus leading to the conclusion that both methods can be applied safely while using PCV-VG mode. In addition, it is thought that there was low risk of barotrauma in PCV-VG mode, since peak inspiratory pressures were measured at about 20 cmH₂O in all three groups.

The limitation of this study is the consistent application of ventilator modes, i.e., tidal volume of 8 mL/kg, followed by 6mL/kg with or without 5 cmH₂O of PEEP. In addition, the shunt ratios during lung surgery may have changed due to pulmonary artery ligation, or handling of the surgical site. As a result, the surgery itself may have influenced the arterial oxygen partial pressure. Since the authors conducted the study in the routine order noted above, the early period of OLV may have maintained better arterial oxygenation. Another limitation is that ideal body weight was not used in calculating the tidal volume. In overweight patients, the tidal volumes may have been overestimated, resulting in possible high airway pressure and causing negative influence on oxygenation. However, since our subjects’ mean body mass index was approximately 24 kg/m², its effect on the study was thought to be minimal. In addition, further study on the clinical implication of low tidal volume in PCV-VG is needed because the postoperative pulmonary status was not measured in this study. In conclusion, while using PCV-VG mode during OLV, a tidal volume of 8mL/kg or 6mL/kg with added PEEP of 5cmH₂O is thought to be a safe method of artificial ventilation, and can reduce airway pressure while maintaining appropriate oxygenation.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.

Consort diagram. TLV, supine two lung ventilation; TV, tidal volume; OLV, one-lung ventilation; P_peak, peak inspiratory pressure; P_mean, mean inspiratory pressure; TVE, exhaled tidal volume; SpO₂, peripheral oxygen saturation; EtCO₂, end-tidal CO₂; ABGA, arterial blood gas analysis; OLV, one-lung ventilation; PCV-VG, pressure-controlled ventilation-volume-guaranteed; PEEP, positive end expiratory pressure; PaO₂, arterial oxygen pressure.

References

• 1. Yun du G, Han JI, Kim DY, Kim JH, Kim YJ, Chung RK. Is small tidal volume with low positive end expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation an effective ventilation method for endoscopic thoracic surgery? Korean J Anesthesiol 2014;67:329–33.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 2. Kim H. Protective strategies for one-lung ventilation. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014;67:233–4.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 3. Jung JD, Kim SH, Yu BS, Kim HJ. Effects of a preemptive alveolar recruitment strategy on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation with different tidal volumes in patients with normal pulmonary function test. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014;67:96–102.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 4. Lee W, Lee JY, Choi DN, Shin CM, Cho K, Kim MH, et al. Airway dimensions and margin of safety with the left-sided double-lumen tube in patients of a short stature. Anesth Pain Med 2015;10:110–7.Article
• 5. Tuğrul M, Camci E, Karadeniz H, Sentürk M, Pembeci K, Akpir K. Comparison of volume controlled with pressure controlled ventilation during one-lung anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1997;79:306–10.ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
• 6. Unzueta MC, Casas JI, Moral MV. Pressure-controlled versus volume-controlled ventilation during one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery. Anesth Analg 2007;104:1029–33.ArticlePubMed
• 7. Boules NS, Ghobrial HZ. Efficiency of the newly introduced ventilatory mode “pressure controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed” in thoracic surgery with one lung ventilation. Egypt J Anaesth 2011;27:113–9.Article
• 8. Pu J, Liu Z, Yang L, Wang Y, Jiang J. Applications of pressure control ventilation volume guaranteed during one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med 2014;7:1094–8.PubMedPMC
• 9. Végh T, Juhász M, Szatmári S, Enyedi A, Sessler DI, Szegedi LL, et al. Effects of different tidal volumes for one-lung ventilation on oxygenation with open chest condition and surgical manipulation: a randomised cross-over trial. Minerva Anestesiol 2013;79:24–32.PubMed
• 10. Keszler M. Volume-targeted ventilation. Early Hum Dev 2006;82:811–8.ArticlePubMed
• 11. Song SY, Jung JY, Cho MS, Kim JH, Ryu TH, Kim BI. Volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation-volume guaranteed mode during one-lung ventilation. Korean J Anesthesiol 2014;67:258–63.ArticlePubMedPMC
• 12. Gal TJ. Con: low tidal volumes are indicated during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg 2006;103:271–3.ArticlePubMed
• 13. Fernández-Pérez ER, Sprung J, Afessa B, Warner DO, Vachon CM, Schroeder DR, et al. Intraoperative ventilator settings and acute lung injury after elective surgery: a nested case control study. Thorax 2009;64:121–7.ArticlePubMed
• 14. Kim SH, Jung KT, An TH. Effects of tidal volume and PEEP on arterial blood gases and pulmonary mechanics during one-lung ventilation. J Anesth 2012;26:568–73.ArticlePubMed

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  

• Pressure-Controlled Ventilation-Volume Guaranteed Mode Combined with an Open-Lung Approach Improves Lung Mechanics, Oxygenation Parameters, and the Inflammatory Response during One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
  Jianli Li, Baogui Cai, Dongdong Yu, Meinv Liu, Xiaoqian Wu, Junfang Rong
  BioMed Research International.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef